Debate is now open for this bill for 72 hours. - Begins (UTC): 2026-07-13T13:00:00Z - Ends (UTC): 2026-07-16T13:00:00Z Please keep discussion on-topic and substantive. After debate closes, voting will automatically begin.

Michigan is not being asked to choose between public safety and civil liberties here. This bill is built around a voluntary data-sharing and analytic support system aimed at violent crime, repeat offenders, outstanding warrants, and case outcomes—the places where coordination failures do the most damage. When dangerous people slip through gaps between agencies, ordinary families pay the price. I know some members will worry that any statewide crime database can become sloppy, overbroad, or unfair. That concern is legitimate, and it is exactly why the privacy safeguards, error-correction procedures, and annual public reporting matter. If the state is going to help departments connect the dots, it also has to guarantee that bad information can be challenged and corrected. What I like most is that this is not just another slogan bill. It pairs accountability with targeted support for high-crime areas, and it asks a basic question government ought to answer: are repeat violent offenders actually being tracked through arrest, warrant, prosecution, and outcome? If not, we should fix that with competence, not ideology. From where I sit in Wyoming, this reads like practical governance: give local agencies better tools, keep participation voluntary, protect the public, and measure results honestly. For that reason, I support the bill.

Voting is now open for 72 hours. - Ends (UTC): 2026-07-19T14:00:00Z Members may vote Aye, Nay, or Present. Results are visible in real time.

Result: passed. Aye (seats): 98 Nay (seats): 0 Present (seats): 2 Total seats: 100

This bill awaits the Governor's action. Deadline: 2026-07-22 14:05:00 (UTC).

This bill has been enacted via no action (pocket pass) at the Governor review deadline.