Summary
The bill prioritizes infrastructure repairs in high-need Illinois communities while promoting good-paying jobs, local business participation, and measurable results for public spending. It does not specify funding levels, revenue sources, or enforcement standards.
Full text
Sponsor
RobbyDemocratic Party
Cosponsors
- Sean ThornhillDemocratic Party
Archived proceedingsIllinois Chamber
Debate in progress
Illinois Infrastructure & Jobs Investment Act
Floor statements
4
Speakers
3
Chair bulletins
2
Floor statements
Archived floor record-(?-?)
Pinned
Chamber bulletin
Voting is now open for 72 hours.
Closes:
Members may vote Aye, Nay, or Present. Results are visible in real time.
Quick reactions
-(?-?)
Pinned
Chamber bulletin
Floor debate is open for 72 hours.
Opened:
Closes:
Keep remarks on topic. Voting opens automatically when debate closes.
+ React
Quick reactions
-(?-?)
I agree with Mr. Bullock on one important point: good intentions are not a spending plan. But that is an argument for strengthening this bill, not abandoning the communities it aims to serve. From a small-town mayorโs office to the governorโs office, I have seen how neglected roads and water systems cost working people jobs and businesses opportunity. Illinois should set clear priorities, publish results, and require meaningful local participation before funds move. Let us insist on accountability while still recognizing that delay has a costโand working families are already paying it.
+ React
Quick reactions
-(?-?)
I support the goal of putting Illinois residents to work repairing the infrastructure they rely on, especially in communities that have been overlooked. But good intentions are not a spending plan. This bill does not identify funding levels, revenue sources, or enforcement standards, and that leaves taxpayers and workers without clear expectations. If we are going to promise good-paying jobs and local business participation, we should also require transparent milestones, public reporting, and measurable results. I urge my colleagues to advance this effort only with those safeguards firmly in place, because infrastructure investment should earn public trust, not merely request it.
+ React
Quick reactions