Summary
Contingent on voter approval of the expanded homestead exemption, the bill automatically grants homeowners the new relief while restricting local governments from offsetting savings through higher millage rates, fees, or assessments. It also requires public votes, detailed tax notices, statewide reporting, and protections for essential services.
Full text
Sponsor
Jason MartinRepublican Party
Cosponsors
None yet
Archived proceedingsFlorida Chamber
Debate in progress
Florida Property Tax Relief
Floor statements
9
Speakers
6
Chair bulletins
4
Floor statements
Archived floor record-(?-?)
Pinned
Chamber bulletin
Voting is now open for 72 hours.
Closes:
Members may vote Aye, Nay, or Present. Results are visible in real time.
Quick reactions
-(?-?)
Pinned
Chamber bulletin
Floor debate is open for 72 hours.
Opened:
Closes:
Keep remarks on topic. Voting opens automatically when debate closes.
+ React
Quick reactions
-(?-?)
Pinned
Chamber bulletin
Voting is now open for 72 hours.
Closes:
Members may vote Aye, Nay, or Present. Results are visible in real time.
+ React
Quick reactions
-(?-?)
Pinned
Chamber bulletin
Floor debate is open for 72 hours.
Opened:
Closes:
Keep remarks on topic. Voting opens automatically when debate closes.
+ React
Quick reactions
-(?-?)
Mr. Speaker, I support this bill because property-tax relief is meaningful only if families actually keep more of what they earn. As others have noted, local governments must not replace lost revenue through higher millage rates, fees, or assessments. That is not reform; it is moving money from one pocket to another. This measure pairs homeowner relief with voter approval, clear tax notices, public votes, and protections for essential services. That is responsible governing: lower the burden, require transparency, and make elected officials answer to the people before raising it again.
+ React
Quick reactions
-(?-?)
Mr. Speaker, I rise in support of meaningful property-tax relief for Florida homeowners, and I appreciate the concern raised that local governments must not replace lost revenue through higher millage rates, fees, or assessments. A promise of relief must be a real promise, not a bookkeeping exercise. This bill respects voters by requiring their approval, gives families clear tax notices, and protects essential services through transparency and reporting. As a former pastor, I believe stewardship matters: we should ease the burden on working families while asking government to live within its means. I urge an aye vote.
+ React
Quick reactions
-(?-?)
Mr. Speaker, I support meaningful property-tax relief for Florida homeowners, and I agree with the concern already raised that local governments must not simply replace lost revenue with higher millage rates, fees, or assessments. As someone who has managed projects and payrolls, I know that a promise is only as sound as its accounting. This bill gives voters the final say, requires clear notices and statewide reporting, and protects essential services from careless disruption. Homeowners deserve room in their budgets, but taxpayers also deserve transparency and local officials who live within responsible limits. I urge an Aye vote.
+ React
Quick reactions
-(?-?)
Mr. Speaker, members of this body—
Florida has long stood for opportunity, ownership, and the belief that if you work hard, play by the rules, and build something for your family, government should not make it harder for you to keep it.
Yet across our state, homeowners are watching the value of their property rise while wondering whether they will eventually be able to afford the taxes required to stay in the very home they worked their entire lives to own.
That is not the Florida promise.
This legislation is based on a simple principle: when we tell Floridians we are giving them property tax relief, they should actually receive property tax relief.
We should not increase a homestead exemption with one hand only to allow government to take those savings back with the other through higher millage rates, new fees, or additional assessments.
This bill protects homeowners while recognizing that our communities still have real responsibilities. We will protect law enforcement, firefighters, emergency medical services, hurricane preparedness, critical infrastructure, and other essential services. But protecting essential services does not mean writing government a blank check.
Florida families and Florida businesses make difficult financial decisions every day. When costs go up, they prioritize. They find efficiencies. They distinguish between what they want and what they truly need.
Government should be expected to do the same.
And when a local government believes it genuinely needs more money from its taxpayers, it should be prepared to explain publicly how much it needs, why it needs it, where the money will go, and what alternatives were considered before asking homeowners to pay more.
This is not about weakening local government.
It is about strengthening accountability.
It is about protecting the homeowner, protecting essential services, and restoring the understanding that taxpayer money belongs to the taxpayer before it ever belongs to government.
If you worked for your home, paid for your home, raised your family in your home, and made it part of your future, government should make it easier—not harder—for you to keep it.
That is what this legislation intends to do, and that is why I respectfully ask for your support.
+ React
Quick reactions
-(?-?)
I support meaningful property-tax relief for Florida homeowners, especially for families who have seen their property values rise while their tax burden continues to grow. However, tax relief must be paired with fiscal responsibility. Local governments should not simply replace lost property-tax revenue through higher millage rates or new fees without clearly explaining why the additional revenue is necessary. I support the bill’s transparency requirements and its protections for essential services, while believing that government should prioritize spending and demonstrate a genuine public need before asking taxpayers for more money.
+ React
Quick reactions