Colleagues, I want to build on a point both Representative Carter and Representative Kent made: right now, access to real STEM education depends far too much on ZIP code. That is not a minor curriculum issue; it is an opportunity issue. If a student in one Colorado district graduates having written code, worked through engineering problems, and learned how modern systems function, while another student never gets that chance, we are effectively deciding their future options before they are old enough to choose for themselves.
As someone with a technology background, I also want to stress that this bill is not about turning every child into a software engineer. It is about basic literacy in the world they are already living in. Computer science teaches logic, problem-solving, and how to engage with the systems that increasingly shape work, healthcare, finance, and daily life. Requiring one coding-inclusive computer science credit in high school is a reasonable floor, not an excessive mandate.
Now, I do think implementation matters. Colorado will need qualified teachers, workable standards, and enough flexibility so rural and under-resourced schools can meet the requirement without being set up to fail. But that is an argument for doing this responsibly, not for avoiding it. On balance, this is a practical, future-facing bill, and I support it.