Summary
The bill allocates $100 million over two years for clean-coal tax credits, worker training, research, infrastructure, and a new authority focused on preserving Eastern Kentucky jobs while maintaining environmental rules and reliable power.
Full text
Judicial Review
No judicial review
No Supreme Court cases are currently attached to this law.
No cases filed.
Sponsor
Justin harrisRepublican Party
Cosponsors
- Harlan MontgomeryRepublican Party
Archived proceedingsKentucky Chamber
Debate in progress
Clean coal intiatives
Floor statements
10
Speakers
6
Chair bulletins
3
Floor statements
Archived floor record-(?-?)
Pinned
Chamber bulletin
This bill awaits the Governor's action. Deadline: 2026-09-15 13:25:11 (UTC).
Quick reactions
-(?-?)
Pinned
Chamber bulletin
Voting is now open for 72 hours.
Closes:
Members may vote Aye, Nay, or Present. Results are visible in real time.
+ React
Quick reactions
-(?-?)
Pinned
Chamber bulletin
Floor debate is open for 72 hours.
Opened:
Closes:
Keep remarks on topic. Voting opens automatically when debate closes.
+ React
Quick reactions
-(?-?)
This bill has been enacted via no action (pocket pass) at the Governor review deadline.
+ React
Quick reactions
-(?-?)
Result: passed.
Aye: 71 seats
Nay: 29 seats
Present: 0 seats
Total seats: 100
+ React
Quick reactions
-(?-?)
Colleagues, Mr. Navarro is right that worker training must produce measurable results, and Mr. Calhoun is right that this is not a blank check. From my years in uniform and investigative service, I learned that good intentions are not a substitute for oversight. This bill makes a responsible investment in Eastern Kentucky jobs, dependable power, and cleaner coal technology while preserving environmental rules. I support the funding, but I expect clear reporting on credits awarded, workers trained, research delivered, and infrastructure completed. If we ask taxpayers to invest, we owe them proof that the investment is working.
+ React
Quick reactions
-(?-?)
Colleagues, I appreciate the caution raised by Mr. Navarro: this cannot be a blank check, and worker training must lead to real opportunity. But we should not let the perfect become the enemy of the practical. Eastern Kentucky families need reliable power, good jobs, and a fair chance to stay in the communities they built. This bill invests in workers, infrastructure, research, and cleaner coal while keeping environmental rules in place. As someone who has built a business in Kentucky, I know investment must produce results. Let’s pass this measure and hold it to that standard.
+ React
Quick reactions
-(?-?)
People of Kentucky—
Eastern Kentucky did not get rich on slogans. It paid mortgages, churches, ball teams, and school levies with mine work. When a plant closes, a family leaves for Ohio and a county budget cracks. That is not abstract. That is Harlan, Pike, Letcher, Perry, Floyd, Knott, and Breathitt.
This Act does not ask you to pretend coal never existed. It asks you to keep those counties in the work: capture, coal-to-products, minerals from the refuse already sitting above the creeks, and apprenticeships at Hazard, Prestonsburg, and Southeast Kentucky so a miner can stay home and stay employed.
It also asks the rest of the Commonwealth for something simple: cheap, firm power. Homes, farms, and factories cannot run on hope. The bill leaves air and water law in force. It does not buy a free pass for dirty stacks.
Pass it so the next payroll lands where the coal came from—not so Frankfort can write the mountains out of the tax base and call it progress.
Stand with the people who dug it.
+ React
Quick reactions
-(?-?)
Colleagues, I agree with Mr. Calhoun that this cannot be a blank check for the coal industry. But neither should it be a blank check for optimism. If we are asking Eastern Kentucky communities to trust this legislature, the worker training, research, and infrastructure funds must produce measurable results, while environmental rules remain fully enforceable. Reliable power matters, but so does clean air and a credible path beyond declining industries. I support this bill as a targeted transition effort, provided we judge it by jobs preserved, pollution reduced, and communities prepared for what comes next.
+ React
Quick reactions
-(?-?)
Colleagues, this bill is not a blank check for the coal industry; it is a practical investment in workers, reliable power, and communities that have carried this country through generations. The $100 million is tied to training, research, infrastructure, and environmental rules—not wishful thinking. We can debate how to improve the authority’s oversight, but abandoning Eastern Kentucky families would be neither compassionate nor economically serious. Arizona knows what happens when dependable energy is treated as an afterthought. If we want cleaner power without higher costs and lost jobs, we should support this measured, accountable approach.
+ React
Quick reactions