Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • VGS Admin
Posted (edited)

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

Senator Vinachelli, on behalf of himself and others, introduce

A BILL

To allocate Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act funds to New Jersey and New York for critical transportation projects, providing equitable funding for regional priorities without requiring the implementation of the New York City congestion tax.

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the 'Fair Transportation Funding Act'

SEC. 2. FINDINGS AND PURPOSE.

(a) Findings. Congress finds that:

  1. The Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA) provides $1.2 trillion in funding for transportation infrastructure improvements.
  2. The New York City congestion tax places an undue financial burden on commuters, particularly those from New Jersey and the outer boroughs, who rely on their vehicles for work and essential services.
  3. Regional transportation priorities, including public transit upgrades, roadway improvements, and bridge maintenance, are critical for economic growth, public safety, and national security.
  4. The New York metropolitan area (including Northern New Jersey) is the largest metropolitan economy in the world with a gross metropolitan product of over $2.5 trillion, home to the busies maritime cargo port in the U.S., and the busiest gateway for international and domestic passenger flights, supporting hundreds of millions of Americans and international visitors each year.
  5. New York and New Jersey are the two largest donor states, sending over $33 billion more in combined tax revenues to the federal government than either state receives in federal funds each year.
  6. Equitable allocation of federal funds can address these priorities without imposing additional costs on working families and businesses.

(b) Purpose. The purpose of this Act is to:

  1. Direct a portion of IIJA funds to New York and New Jersey to fully fund regional transportation priorities.
  2. Eliminate the need for the New York City congestion tax plan by providing federal funding for the same objectives.
  3. Ensure transparency, accountability, and equitable use of federal funds for critical infrastructure projects.

SEC. 3. ALLOCATION OF FUNDS.

(a) Authorization of Funding.

  1. The Secretary of Transportation shall allocate $30 billion from unallocated IIJA funds to New Jersey and New York for the following purposes:
  • (A) Upgrades and maintenance for the Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA), New Jersey Transit, and Port Authority of New York and New Jersey infrastructure.
  • (B) Improvements to regional roadways, bridges, and tunnels, including the George Washington Bridge, Lincoln Tunnel, and Holland Tunnel.
  • (C) Expansion and modernization of public transit services to reduce traffic congestion and emissions.

(b) Prohibition on Use of Congestion Pricing Revenue.

  1. No funds allocated under this Act shall be contingent upon or offset by revenue from a congestion tax or similar vehicular tolling programs.
  2. Private investment, including from public private partnerships, shall count toward federal matching requirements for competitive grants.

(c) Priority Projects.

  1. Priority shall be given to projects that:
  • (A) Enhance safety and reliability of existing infrastructure;
  • (B) Improve access for underserved communities;
  • (C) Promote regional economic growth and job creation;
  • (D) Meet or exceed all federal contracting labor guidelines; and
  • (E) Reduce environmental impacts through sustainable and climate-resilient infrastructure.


SEC. 4. REPORTING REQUIREMENTS AND OVERSIGHT.

(a) Annual Reporting.

  1. Recipients of funds under this Act shall submit an annual report to the Secretary of Transportation detailing:
  • (A) Progress on funded projects.
  • (B) Use of funds in accordance with the purposes outlined in this Act.
  • (C) Impact on traffic congestion, emissions, and regional economic activity.

(b) Independent Oversight.

  1. An independent commission shall be established to ensure transparency and accountability in the allocation and use of funds.

SEC. 5. REMEDIATION TAX CREDIT FOR CERTAIN CONGESTION TOLLS. (w/Thanks to Congressman Gottheimer, Van Drew, and Lawler.)

(a) In general.—Subpart B of part IV of subchapter A of chapter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding after section 30D the following new section:

“SEC. 30E. Certain congestion tolls.

“(a) In general.—There shall be allowed as a credit against the tax imposed by this chapter for the taxable year an amount equal to the sum of any congestion tax (as defined in section 6(a) of this Act) paid or incurred during the taxable year by such taxpayer for the use of any qualified vehicular crossing immediately before entry into the congestion tolling zone (as such term is defined in section 6(a) of this Act).

“(b) Qualified vehicular crossing.—For purposes of this section, the term ‘qualified vehicular crossing’ means any of the vehicular crossing known as the Holland Tunnel, the Lincoln Tunnel, the George Washington Bridge, or any other vehicular crossing for the use of crossing immediately before entry into the congestion tolling zone.

“(c) No double benefit.—The amount of any deduction or other credit allowable under this chapter for a congestion toll for which a credit is allowable under subsection (a) shall be reduced by the amount of credit allowed under such subsection.”.

(b) Definitions.

  1. CONGESTION TAX.—The term “congestion tax” means a toll charged for entry into or remaining in the congestion tolling zone.
  2. CONGESTION TOLLING ZONE.—The term “congestion tolling zone” means any roadways, bridges, tunnels, approaches, or ramps that are located within, or enter to, the geographic area in the borough of Manhattan south of and inclusive of Sixtieth Street to the extent practicable, but does not include the Franklin D. Roosevelt Drive.

SEC. 6. HAMPTON ROADS INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTMENT.

(a) FINDINGS.—Congress finds that:

   (1) The Port of Virginia in Hampton Roads handles cargo that supplies 14 states, representing a critical node in national supply chain infrastructure;

   (2) The region's rail infrastructure connects the entire Eastern Seaboard, facilitating interstate commerce and national security operations;

   (3) Hampton Roads hosts the largest concentration of military bases and facilities in the United States, requiring robust transportation infrastructure for national defense purposes;

   (4) The region faces unique infrastructure challenges due to sea level rise and subsidence, threatening critical national assets.

(b) ALLOCATION OF FUNDS.—

   (1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Transportation shall allocate $15 billion from unallocated Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act funds for the following purposes:

      (A) Port modernization and expansion projects at the Port of Virginia;

      (B) Railway infrastructure improvements in the Hampton Roads region;

      (C) Coastal resilience measures protecting critical transportation infrastructure;

      (D) Multi-modal transportation improvements supporting military facilities.

   (2) PRIORITY PROJECTS.—Priority shall be given to projects that:

      (A) Enhance national supply chain resilience;

      (B) Improve military mobility and readiness;

      (C) Incorporate flood mitigation and coastal resilience measures;

      (D) Support interstate commerce and economic growth;

      (E) Meet or exceed federal environmental and labor standards.

(c) REPORTING REQUIREMENTS.—

   (1) Recipients shall submit annual reports to the Secretary detailing:

      (A) Project progress and outcomes;

      (B) National economic impact;

      (C) Supply chain improvements;

      (D) Military readiness enhancements.

SEC. 7. EFFECTIVE DATE.

This Act shall take effect immediately upon enactment.

Quote

This bill dedicates $30 billion of unallocated funds from the bipartisan infrastructure bill to New Jersey and New York to fund regional public transportation projects that prioritize economic growth and climate resilience in underserved communities utilizing federal labor contract requirements in lieu of local congestion taxes. Allows private investment and public private partnerships in lieu of congestion pricing to support federal cost sharing requirements for competitive grants. Requires annual reporting and independent oversight commission to monitor for appropriated funds under this Act. Creates a remediation tax credit to commuters impacted by congestion taxes incurred under the current NYC congestion pricing plan.

 

Edited by Brink
  • Replies 13
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

Vinachelli:

Madam President, 

I rise today as a proud sponsor of the Fair Transportation Funding Act, legislation that represents a commonsense, bipartisan solution to one of the most pressing transportation challenges facing our region and truly, the nation as a whole, since millions of Americans regularly travel through the New York City metro area. Instead of taxing all of them to death, this proposal instead proposes a bold step forward by securing necessary transit and infrastructure funding that millions of Americans benefit from, without the need for controversial congestion taxes.

By dedicating $33 billion in unused funding from the bipartisan infrastructure act to support the Metropolitan Transportation Authority, NJ Transit, and the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, this bill provides the resources necessary to meet all stated monetary goals and objectives of the proposed New York City congestion tax—without placing undue burdens on hardworking commuters from New Jersey, the New York City exurbs, and the other boroughs of New York City. All without appropriating a single new dollar of federal spending.

This is about fairness. It is about recognizing the historic inequities that have left taxpayers in New Jersey and New York subsidizing the federal government’s priorities for far too long and leaving commuters to pick up the slack, while our critical infrastructure struggles to keep up. This legislation also addresses pressing needs like strengthening regional transit networks, advancing transformative projects that connect our states’ economies, and repairing infrastructure damaged by Winter Storm Aria. An area in which both parties this session of Congress have continued to demonstrate bipartisan resolve.

As the expiration of the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act funding draws near at the end of this year, we cannot afford to let this moment pass without ensuring the economic vitality, connectivity, and fairness that our region and everyone who visits, passes through, and does business in, deserves.

Madam President, this is a win for commuters, for businesses, and for the future of our shared prosperity. It achieves all this at no additional cost to federal spending and without the punitive penalties of the congestion tax. I urge my colleagues to join me in passing the Fair Transportation Funding Act and delivering a fair, forward-thinking solution for the millions of people we represent. 

I move for unanimous consent.

Thank you, and I yield the floor.

Goldie (I-NH), Chief of Vox Libertatis "Choose Freedom"

Vini Vinachelli (R-NJ), Chair of Main Street | VR | Press "Pater, Filius et Spiritus Sanctus"

Posted
4 minutes ago, Goldie said:

Vinachelli:

Madam President, 

I rise today as a proud sponsor of the Fair Transportation Funding Act, legislation that represents a commonsense, bipartisan solution to one of the most pressing transportation challenges facing our region and truly, the nation as a whole, since millions of Americans regularly travel through the New York City metro area. Instead of taxing all of them to death, this proposal instead proposes a bold step forward by securing necessary transit and infrastructure funding that millions of Americans benefit from, without the need for controversial congestion taxes.

By dedicating $33 billion in unused funding from the bipartisan infrastructure act to support the Metropolitan Transportation Authority, NJ Transit, and the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, this bill provides the resources necessary to meet all stated monetary goals and objectives of the proposed New York City congestion tax—without placing undue burdens on hardworking commuters from New Jersey, the New York City exurbs, and the other boroughs of New York City. All without appropriating a single new dollar of federal spending.

This is about fairness. It is about recognizing the historic inequities that have left taxpayers in New Jersey and New York subsidizing the federal government’s priorities for far too long and leaving commuters to pick up the slack, while our critical infrastructure struggles to keep up. This legislation also addresses pressing needs like strengthening regional transit networks, advancing transformative projects that connect our states’ economies, and repairing infrastructure damaged by Winter Storm Aria. An area in which both parties this session of Congress have continued to demonstrate bipartisan resolve.

As the expiration of the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act funding draws near at the end of this year, we cannot afford to let this moment pass without ensuring the economic vitality, connectivity, and fairness that our region and everyone who visits, passes through, and does business in, deserves.

Madam President, this is a win for commuters, for businesses, and for the future of our shared prosperity. It achieves all this at no additional cost to federal spending and without the punitive penalties of the congestion tax. I urge my colleagues to join me in passing the Fair Transportation Funding Act and delivering a fair, forward-thinking solution for the millions of people we represent. 

I move for unanimous consent.

Thank you, and I yield the floor.

Madam President

I second the motion for unanimous consent.

I yield.

Michael "Mike" Andrews

Senate Majority Leader

United States Senator from Wisconsin

Press Office | Biography

 

  • VGS Admin
Posted

The motion and second for unanimous consent to pass the legislation are recognized. Senators have 24 hours to object.

Posted

Mr. President,

Last week, I stood at the Port of Virginia's Norfolk International Terminal at dawn. As the sun rose, I watched containers being loaded onto ships bound for fourteen different states. A crane operator named James told me he's been working these docks for thirty years. "Every box I move," he said with pride, "is something somebody somewhere needs."

That's what real national infrastructure looks like. Not special deals for special regions, but connections that bind us all together.

The bill before us today would funnel thirty billion dollars to just two states while creating special tax carve-outs for specific jurisdictions. That's not infrastructure investment – that's playing favorites.

I rise today to offer two amendments.

The first would redirect funding to critical national priorities in the Hampton Roads region – priorities that serve all Americans. The Port of Virginia isn't just Virginia's port – it's a crucial node in America's supply chain, supporting commerce across fourteen states. Our railways don't just serve Virginia – they connect the entire Eastern Seaboard. And Hampton Roads hosts the largest concentration of military bases in the United States, installations that protect every American.

When I covered post-conflict reconstruction as a photojournalist, I learned that infrastructure isn't just about building things – it's about building connections. Every dollar we invest in Hampton Roads' infrastructure strengthens our national security, enhances our economic resilience, and reinforces the connections that make us one nation.

The second amendment strikes the special tax carve-outs from this bill. Local governments should make local transportation decisions without federal interference. We shouldn't be using federal tax policy to pick winners and losers in local transportation debates.

I've documented communities rebuilding after conflict around the world. The successful ones didn't succeed through special deals and carve-outs. They succeeded by building infrastructure that worked for everyone.

That's what these amendments do – they refocus us on truly national priorities while respecting local authority. They replace special interest politics with sound national policy.

Mr. President, I move both amendments, to be considered separately, and ask for their consideration.

I yield the floor.

 

Blackwell I:

At the appropriate place, insert the following:

Quote

 

SEC. __. HAMPTON ROADS INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTMENT.

(a) FINDINGS.—Congress finds that:

   (1) The Port of Virginia in Hampton Roads handles cargo that supplies 14 states, representing a critical node in national supply chain infrastructure;

   (2) The region's rail infrastructure connects the entire Eastern Seaboard, facilitating interstate commerce and national security operations;

   (3) Hampton Roads hosts the largest concentration of military bases and facilities in the United States, requiring robust transportation infrastructure for national defense purposes;

   (4) The region faces unique infrastructure challenges due to sea level rise and subsidence, threatening critical national assets.

(b) ALLOCATION OF FUNDS.—

   (1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Transportation shall allocate $15 billion from unallocated Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act funds for the following purposes:

      (A) Port modernization and expansion projects at the Port of Virginia;

      (B) Railway infrastructure improvements in the Hampton Roads region;

      (C) Coastal resilience measures protecting critical transportation infrastructure;

      (D) Multi-modal transportation improvements supporting military facilities.

   (2) PRIORITY PROJECTS.—Priority shall be given to projects that:

      (A) Enhance national supply chain resilience;

      (B) Improve military mobility and readiness;

      (C) Incorporate flood mitigation and coastal resilience measures;

      (D) Support interstate commerce and economic growth;

      (E) Meet or exceed federal environmental and labor standards.

(c) REPORTING REQUIREMENTS.—

   (1) Recipients shall submit annual reports to the Secretary detailing:

      (A) Project progress and outcomes;

      (B) National economic impact;

      (C) Supply chain improvements;

      (D) Military readiness enhancements.

 

 

Blackwell II:

Strike section 5 and redesignate the subsequent sections accordingly.

At the appropriate place, insert the following:

Quote

 

SEC. __. REMOVAL OF TAX CREDIT PROVISIONS.

(a) IN GENERAL.—Nothing in this Act shall be construed to create new tax credits related to congestion pricing or similar vehicular tolling programs.

(b) PRESERVATION OF LOCAL AUTHORITY.—Nothing in this Act shall be construed to limit the authority of State or local governments to implement transportation funding mechanisms within their jurisdiction.

(c) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—

   (1) The table of contents for this Act is amended by striking the item relating to section 5.

   (2) Any cross-references in this Act to section 5 are deemed null and void.

 

ForumSignature.jpg.3061784a06feca2d8d5394d57dc5a55b.jpg

BIO | PRESS | RECORD

R19: Robert Albion (R-OH, Vice Chair of the Republican Mainstreet Committee) & The Dialectic | Nate Calloway (R-NE) | Clara Blackwell (D-VA)

Posted
4 minutes ago, Goldie said:

Madam President,

I move for cloture.

I yield.

Madam President 

I second the motion.

I yield.

Michael "Mike" Andrews

Senate Majority Leader

United States Senator from Wisconsin

Press Office | Biography

 

  • VGS Admin
Posted (edited)
5 hours ago, Clara Blackwell said:

Mr. President,

Last week, I stood at the Port of Virginia's Norfolk International Terminal at dawn. As the sun rose, I watched containers being loaded onto ships bound for fourteen different states. A crane operator named James told me he's been working these docks for thirty years. "Every box I move," he said with pride, "is something somebody somewhere needs."

That's what real national infrastructure looks like. Not special deals for special regions, but connections that bind us all together.

The bill before us today would funnel thirty billion dollars to just two states while creating special tax carve-outs for specific jurisdictions. That's not infrastructure investment – that's playing favorites.

I rise today to offer two amendments.

The first would redirect funding to critical national priorities in the Hampton Roads region – priorities that serve all Americans. The Port of Virginia isn't just Virginia's port – it's a crucial node in America's supply chain, supporting commerce across fourteen states. Our railways don't just serve Virginia – they connect the entire Eastern Seaboard. And Hampton Roads hosts the largest concentration of military bases in the United States, installations that protect every American.

When I covered post-conflict reconstruction as a photojournalist, I learned that infrastructure isn't just about building things – it's about building connections. Every dollar we invest in Hampton Roads' infrastructure strengthens our national security, enhances our economic resilience, and reinforces the connections that make us one nation.

The second amendment strikes the special tax carve-outs from this bill. Local governments should make local transportation decisions without federal interference. We shouldn't be using federal tax policy to pick winners and losers in local transportation debates.

I've documented communities rebuilding after conflict around the world. The successful ones didn't succeed through special deals and carve-outs. They succeeded by building infrastructure that worked for everyone.

That's what these amendments do – they refocus us on truly national priorities while respecting local authority. They replace special interest politics with sound national policy.

Mr. President, I move both amendments, to be considered separately, and ask for their consideration.

I yield the floor.

 

Blackwell I:

At the appropriate place, insert the following:

 

Blackwell II:

Strike section 5 and redesignate the subsequent sections accordingly.

At the appropriate place, insert the following:

 

5 hours ago, Blake said:

Mr. President,

I second both amendments.

I yield.

 

Blackwell I and II have been recognized. Senators have 24 hours to vote.

 

https://www.dynamicsim.online/forums/topic/2650-blackwell-ii-sb26-fair-transportation-funding-act/

Edited by Brink
  • VGS Admin
Posted (edited)

The Blackwell I amendment has passed. The legislation has been updated to reflect the changes. Sections in green have been added due to the amendment, while sections in red that are striken through have been removed due to the amendments.

The Blackwell II amendment failed.

 

Edited by Brink
  • VGS Admin
Posted
On 1/7/2025 at 9:30 AM, Goldie said:

Madam President,

I move for cloture.

I yield.

 

On 1/7/2025 at 9:35 AM, Conrad said:

Madam President 

I second the motion.

I yield.

Cloture motion and second are recognized. Senators have 24 hours to vote on the motion.

 

 

  • Brink locked this topic
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Latest VGS News

    • A Sudden Burst of Sanity Strikes Congress By Rondal Goldfarb In another whiplash moment that defied expectations, Congress courageously stood up in unity to push back against some of the most egregious policy proposals of the 119th sessions to expand the welfare state.  In a shocking plot twist, the uniparty united against itself in a flurry of final votes in the final death throes of the 119th Congress. After a long session of rocketing through so many socialist bills through Congress at a speed that almost risked warping space time to deliver us into an alternative universe where their dystopian hellscape thrives, Speaker Jeffries and Minority Leader Hern (R-OK) curb stomped the brakes so hard that they actually flipped time back into a world where common sense survives and the free market still reigns, if only for a blissful but serene moment. After months of Democrats campaigning hard on their Soviet housing scheme, the HOUSE Act, and pitching the idea to every exhausted midwest farmer who took a blood oath to vote for them if they would just stop harassing them, Congresscritters united in lockstep to flush their own bill down the toilet and say JK by a vote of 433-0! Back to the drawing board. And thank goodness. The HOUSE Act, sponsored by Senators Storm, Guenther, and our old friend, Commie Kahiona, has a litany of problems with it but now that it has been relegated to the dustbin of history by the sponsors’ own Party, we’ll just cover the topline insanity: The HOUSE Act invests $175 Billion in taxpayer dollars into new public housing projects. Par for the course from The Three Apparatchiks. Public housing is a fundamentally flawed policy that exemplifies the inefficiencies of government intervention in the housing market. By centralizing control over housing production and management, public housing programs often suffer from poor quality construction, inadequate maintenance, and misallocation of resources. These projects frequently fail to meet the actual needs of low-income communities, fostering dependency rather than empowerment. Furthermore, public housing disrupts the natural dynamics of supply and demand, discouraging private investment and innovation in affordable housing solutions and raising costs for everyone else. A better approach would be to reduce regulatory barriers, such as construction mandates and Davis Bacon requirements, to encourage a competitive housing market that organically addresses the diverse needs of individuals while promoting economic mobility and self-reliance. While it is perfectly reasonable to question the Republican leadership’s judgment as well, given their sworn allegiance to the People’s First Agenda, the move somewhat tracks with the sudden reversal from trend in their decision to kill the veto overturn over the Blutarsky Bill. Interestingly though, the Republicans are the only ones that have justified their actions in the House on this issue. Democrats, meanwhile, have been as unified in their silence on the motion as they were in their opposition. Outgoing Senate Majority Leader Duplantis (R-Red Lobster) tried to get Senator Storm to answer for it on the Corporate News Media’s bungled election coverage but was met with the same deafening silence as when Vanessa Taylor herself also asked them questions they did not want to answer. Personally, we do not really need a reason; we just hope this turning over a new leaf for Congress carries over into the next session. But wait. There’s more! After politically posturing from adding modest benefit changes to Medicare all the way through Medicare for All and beyond, House Democrats and Republicans both finally mustered enough courage to unanimously renounce a bill by the DNC Chair herself, Senator O’Hare (D-HI), to provide coverage for dental, vision, and hearing services under Medicare. Nevermind that the program has less than 10 years left to live even before considering the additional costs of the proposed expanded benefits. For reasons that remain unknown to all, (even staffers could be seen literally aghast from camera #4 on C-SPAN 2,) House Democrats under Speaker Jeffries finally heard the call of their fallen comrade, President Biden, and beat Medicare. Or saved it, from our perspective. At least for now. We really are not in Kansas anymore. This phenomenon is basically unprecedented in House history. Why did the leadership of a party that campaigned so heavily on housing and health issues suddenly bring up their own bills in the final weeks of Congress only to self-immolate them on the floor like a teething toddler in a tantrum? The world may never know.  But for the rest of us watching at home, your entitlements will endure a little longer, and we are not all being rounded into taxpayer-sponsored Soviet style tenements against our will just yet. At least until January. Until then, you can check out any time you like, but only if you continue to: #ChooseFreedom
    • Treasury Secretary Levi Koenig Approves New Opportunity Zones in New Jersey, Calls for Nationwide Participation by Jean Luke Perry Secretary of the Treasury Levi Koenig has announced the approval of a request to designate New Jersey’s Urban Enterprise Zones as federal Opportunity Zones at the request of Senator Vini Vinachelli (R-NJ), marking a significant expansion of the program aimed at driving economic revitalization in distressed communities. The move comes as part of the Innovation Growth Amendment under the Permanent Tax Cuts Act, championed by Senators Levi Koenig (R-FL), Osiris Storm (D-NY), Charlotte O’Hare (D-HI), and led by the Van Horn administration. The initiative will bring a new round of 5,000 Opportunity Zones to economically struggling areas, including those within New Jersey’s UEZs. Secretary Koenig hailed the decision as a “strategic alignment of federal and state resources to unlock unprecedented investment and growth.” “New Jersey’s Urban Enterprise Zones have been a proven success in fostering economic development, and expanding the Opportunity Zone program to these areas will enhance their impact,” Koenig said in a press conference. “I encourage states across the country to submit their proposals for the next round of designations so we can continue driving transformative change in underserved communities.” New Jersey’s UEZs, which have historically faced high unemployment and limited access to capital, will now benefit from the tax incentives and investment opportunities provided by the OZ framework. This dual-front strategy leverages federal and state initiatives to attract private-sector investment, support infrastructure projects, and stimulate business development. The Treasury Department also confirmed that existing Opportunity Zones expiring in December 2026 would be eligible for re-designation under the new legislation, granting an additional five years of benefits to previously designated areas. This renewal option aims to ensure sustained growth in areas where OZs have shown measurable success. Governor Jack Ciattarelli of New Jersey added, “This designation positions our state as a leader in economic revitalization. We’re committed to ensuring these new Opportunity Zones create equitable and sustainable opportunities for residents and businesses.” The Treasury Department has invited all states to submit proposals for the expanded Opportunity Zone program, emphasizing the importance of targeting areas with significant economic challenges. Secretary Koenig assured that the application process would prioritize transparency and collaboration with local governments and community stakeholders. As the next round of Opportunity Zone designations begins, the federal government is optimistic that the expanded program will continue driving private investment into areas most in need, fulfilling its mission to foster economic opportunity and build stronger, more resilient communities.
  • Upcoming Events

    No upcoming events found
  • Recent Achievements


×
×
  • Create New...