Spin Zone - Q3 2026

[Brink]

Spin Zone Format:

Name and State: 

Reason: 

Target(s): 

[Bullet points/brief outline of talking points during appearance.]

 

 

Reminder: you will be able to target no more than two of the following targets in a single spin zone and you cannot target different ends of the political spectrum like right wing and left wing. Additionally, you must use these targets, you cannot make up your own at this time.

- National Right Wing (e.g. Breitbart, Fox News Channel)

- National Center (e.g. NPR, The Hill)

- National Left Wing (e.g. MSNBC, The New York Times)

- Local (e.g. your local TV station, statewide news site)

- International (e.g. BBC News, Reuters)

 

Example:

Name and State: Joe Schmo (D-WA)

Reason: Outlawing Tuna Fishing

Target: Center, Left Wing (you don't necessarily have to use the National word if you are targeting a specific wing)

 

- Tuna populations, particularly species like bluefin, are critically overfished. Continuing to allow tuna fishing threatens the delicate balance of marine ecosystems, leading to the collapse of ocean food chains that many other species depend on.

- Tuna fishing methods often result in high levels of bycatch, accidentally trapping and killing other marine species, including dolphins, sharks, and sea turtles. Outlawing tuna fishing would help prevent unnecessary harm to these vulnerable species.

- Instead of depleting wild tuna stocks, the U.S. can focus on sustainable fishing practices and alternatives, such as tuna farming in controlled environments. This would preserve natural tuna populations while still supporting seafood industries and consumer demand.

Edited December 23, 2024 by Brink

[Elizabeth Hunt R-AL]

Name and State: Elizabeth Hunt, Alabama 

Reason: Pornographic Content Reform Act 

Target: Center, Right Wing 

 

- The porn industry for years has been abusing young men and women with when it comes to acting within said industry. For years it has been normalized in order to get a job in that said industry you need to have sex with your boss or your boss's boss or whatever. How is that at all normal, let's call it what it is abuse at the highest levels this law limits that. 

- Another issue this industry has done is human trafficking almost a few years ago a porn production company was indicated by the Department of Justice for running a human trafficking scheme that smuggled girls into this country and force them to commit work they did not want to do or withdrew their consent to do. With the E-Verify and mandate of having the actors be licensed allows for more safety and regulations to prevent such abuses. 

- The act also serves the public good by making more stagnant consequences for those who reveal photos or videos of people without their consent. I know this deeply as most of the world knows I did things in my much younger years that were leaked online that I hope would stay a secret, instead it didn't and someone tried to punish me for speaking my mind this part of the bill protects men and women who no longer have to be scared of their past in order to speak their mind. 

- This is a movement only growing, even though only two states have passed bills that have some part of the idea that I filled in congress it is a movement that is to hold accountable who produce and fund such operations and keeping everyone safe no matter your beliefs a person should feel safe in their work environment, and be free to speak their mind without people exposing what they do.  

[camilodeso]

Name: Rafael Coleman (D-CO)
Reason: Committee Report on the Snowden Pardon
Target: Center, Left
 

• The pardon of Edward Snowden was made without consulting experts or following standard processes, raising serious questions about judgment and accountability in decisions that impact our national security. This wasn’t about listening to opposing views or considering all angles. It was a unilateral move that bypassed safeguards designed to protect the American people. When decisions this significant are made without proper input, it risks our safety and erodes trust in leadership.

• Our intelligence community is at the forefront of protecting America from threats like terrorism and cyberattacks, but this decision disrupted their work and morale. Senior officials testified about widespread dissatisfaction, even near-resignations, at some of our most critical agencies. The President’s choice not to seek their advice didn’t just ignore their expertise, it undermined their ability to do their jobs effectively, which directly impacts our security at home.

• Diplomacy is one of America’s strongest tools for keeping the world stable and secure, but this pardon rattled our closest allies and gave adversaries an easy win. Our partners in Europe, who rely on us for intelligence sharing, are now questioning our reliability. These relationships aren’t abstract, they’re what keep global threats from reaching our neighborhoods. Ignoring these consequences shows a disregard for the alliances that keep us safe.

• Transparency is essential for trust in government, but the use of executive privilege to shield key discussions about this pardon sends a troubling message. When leaders refuse to explain decisions that impact national security, it’s the American people who are left in the dark. Accountability isn’t just a buzzword, it’s a cornerstone of democracy, and we should expect better from anyone in the highest office.

• This isn’t about politics or partisanship, it’s about ensuring our leaders make decisions responsibly and with the input of experts. The pardon may have been the President’s legal right, but that doesn’t make it the right choice for our country. Moving forward, we must demand stronger safeguards and more transparency to ensure that future decisions are made with the seriousness and care they deserve.

[TexAgRepublican]

Name and State: Jackie Swanner (White House Comms)
Reason: Snowden Select Committee
Target: National Center, International

•    I don’t know what Democrats expected to find, but whatever it was, they didn’t find it. The report was very clear that there was no foreign interference, and the President acted within his Constitutional role as President in pardoning Edward Snowden. 
•    The President issued the pardon because it was the right thing to do, not just for Edward Snowden, but for the United States as a whole. The President has talked repeatedly about the damaging lack of trust in our institutions, and this is a step towards repairing that trust. This is a decision that was praised by people across the political spectrum. How often do you see Bernie Sanders and Earl Duplantis agree on anything? 
•    And the praise didn’t just come from back home. The pardon was also praised by the UN Human Rights Commission and Human Rights Watch as being a step in the right direction for the United States. The President has talked time and again about how the United States has a mission to bring peace, prosperity, and freedom to the world. This pardon aligns with that mission, and it aligns with efforts to repeal sanctions, normalize relations and facilitate stability around the globe. Look at how we brought democracy to Venezuela – not with American bombs but with American diplomacy. Look at how we ended the war in Ukraine. Look at how we got North Korea to get rid of their nuclear weapons and open themselves to the world. This is real change happening in real time, and we are not going to let lawfare from the opposition party stop us. 

[TexAgRepublican]

Name and State: Jackie Swanner (White House Comms)
Reason: Snowden Select Committee
Target: National Center, National Right-Wing

•    I don’t know what Democrats expected to find, but whatever it was, they didn’t find it. The report was very clear that there was no foreign interference, and the President acted within his Constitutional role as President in pardoning Edward Snowden. 
•    If Democrats win the midterms, expect to see more lawfare like this. Forget about whatever other promises they make. This is what they really care about, and this is how they would use a Senate majority. They don’t care about making your life better. Senator Guenther was very clear about that in his press conference. He plans to continue the witch hunt. 
•    This is all the Democrats have left. Look at the record. We’ve brought peace and stability to the world. We’ve increased wages from 2.5% to 7.5% on an annual basis with the People First Agenda. They can’t compete with that, nor do they even want to. Like I said, they are not interested in helping Americans. A lot of them are trying to block an energy bill that will lower gas prices. 
•    The choice in the midterms is very clear. If you want more lawfare, vote for the Democrats. If you want higher wages, lower gas prices, and world peace, then vote for the Republicans. 

[TexAgRepublican]

Name and State: Jackie Swanner (White House Comms)
Reason: Success of the People First Agenda
Target: National Center, National Right-Wing

•    The People First Agenda has put workers back in control of this country. Wage growth has increased from 2.5% on an annual basis to 7.5% in less than two years.
•    This was not an accident. This is what we campaigned on in 2024. We told the American people we were going to cut taxes, raise wages, get rid of regulations, and protect American workers with E-Verify. We promised, and we delivered. 
•    Tipped workers are saving an average of $1,200 a year from no longer paying taxes on tips. The average household is saving in total almost $4,000 a year in tax cuts, credits and rebates from the People First Agenda. These savings generate economic growth that creates jobs for workers – American workers. Not undocumented workers, but people who are authorized to work here. That’s why wages are going up. There’s a demand for labor, American workers are reaping the benefits, and the People First Agenda guarantees them a fair wage. 

[camilodeso]

Name: Rafael Coleman (D-CO)
Reason: Snowden Select Committee
Target: Center, International
 

• The report does state that the President acted within his Constitutional authority, but that’s not the issue. The question is whether he used that authority responsibly. By bypassing standard processes and expert advice, this pardon set a dangerous precedent. While there’s no evidence of foreign interference, the lack of transparency raises serious concerns about decision-making on matters that directly impact national security and the trust of the American people.
• The President may believe the pardon was the right thing to do, but the execution of that decision ignored the safeguards in place to ensure sound judgment. Building trust in our institutions doesn’t come from unilateral actions made without consultation, it comes from demonstrating accountability and respect for expert advice. Trust is built when leaders show they are willing to work through the proper channels, even when the decisions are difficult. If the President didn't trust the likes of John Kelly and Nikki Haley with a simple dialogue on the topic, then there is a serious issue somewhere.
• While some figures praised the pardon, others, including senior intelligence officials and diplomatic leaders, voiced serious concerns about its consequences. Building consensus shouldn’t come at the cost of compromising national security or alienating key allies. It’s one thing to bring diverse voices together, it’s another to make decisions that disrupt critical operations and partnerships.
• Diplomacy and global leadership are important, but this pardon didn’t strengthen U.S. credibility. It caused disruptions within our intelligence community and strained relationships with our closest allies. This pardon risks undermining the very values the President claims to promote.
• This isn’t about partisan politics or so-called "lawfare", it’s about accountability. The concerns raised by the committee reflect bipartisan values of transparency and responsible governance. Democrats aren’t questioning the legality of the pardon, what we’re questioning is the judgment and process behind it. President Van Horn didn't even consult the Office of the Pardon Attorney, I mean, these are the basics! Our families may be less safe because the President rushed to judgment, and it isn't just here in the US, but around the globe because instead of taking the time to consult our best and brightest, the President has continued to make unchecked, unilateral decisions. The American people deserve to know that decisions affecting their safety and global standing are made with the care and consideration they warrant. Full stop. The President failed us on that.

[Tuna]

Name and State: Senator Gus Guenther, Rhode Island
Reason: Select Committee Report on Snowden pardon
Target: National Right Wing (Fox News, Newsmax, Talk Radio)

• "The most important responsibility of the Commander in Chief is to protect the American people. And Kyle Van Horn left America more at risk of a major terrorist attack today than before the pardon. He sold out our security, your community, and your children's safety all for the sake of Edward Snowden."
• "The most damning thing of all in this Select Committee report is that President Van Horn—without consulting anyone—threw our troops and intel officials under the bus. Our soldiers are now in the bullseye and our spies and intelligence assets overseas at risk of compromise because he decided to pardon a damn traitor to America."
• "Imagine if right after 9/11, someone stole our classified documents and fled to Bin Laden's compound for sanctuary. And then imagine if President Bush pardoned that guy anyway, despite him betraying his country and putting our national security at risk. That's exactly what Van Horn did with Snowden."
• "This President betrayed not only his fellow Americans. He betrayed his fellow Republicans and earnest conservatives. We now have cabinet officials either being silenced by executive privilege to prevent them from speaking out. Our intelligence community and soldiers are demoralized and contemplating resigning. And our enemies are more emboldened than ever. That's not peace through strength. That's called retreating with your tail between your legs. And I know Republicans deserve better than that from their President."

[Tuna]

Name and State: Senator Gus Guenther, Rhode Island
Reason: Select Committee Report on Snowden pardon
Target: National Center

• "Every American should be alarmed—not just by the report but the White House's childish and nonchalant response to this scandal of their own making. Let's be clear here: the Office of the Pardon Attorney, the Secretary of State, CIA Director, the Director of National Intelligence, all 17 US intelligence agencies, and our allies were all kept in the dark by this President about his decision to pardon Snowden. He intentionally ignored them because he knew they would give him the honest feedback he didn't want to hear. Van Horn would rather be right in his own self-aggrandizing mind than to do right by the men and women of our military and intelligence corps." 
• "If President Van Horn thought he was restoring trust between the people and their government by pardoning Snowden, he's sadly mistaken. Now, our soldiers and their families no longer trust this President to put their safety first. Americans can't trust him to put their interests before that of a literal traitor to our country. Heck, his own cabinet can't even trust him anymore after he went behind their backs. But guess who can trust Van Horn? Our enemies, that's who!" 
• "What's incredibly telling is their response to this scandal. While half the cabinet and our intelligence community is despondent and on the cusp of quitting, this President and his Chief of Staff are craptweeting nonsense and celebrating. They think their actions have been vindicated. Can you imagine how insulting that must feel for a veteran or a spy working overseas, working 14, 15 hours a day to keep us safe? To watch their President gloating about pardoning a traitor? It's time to censure this President and ensure real accountability for his behavior." 

[Knightley]

Name and State: U.S. Senator Arthur Conroy (D-NM)
Reason: Select Committee Report on Edward Snowden's Pardon
Target: National Left Wing, International

• "Van Horn's presidency continues to represent itself as an abhorrent danger to American institutions - and that is not even my own opinion. The Select Committee's report has left a dangerous reading of how Kyle Van Horn is exercising executive power and his complete disregard for governing with the advice and support of his cabinet officials. Former Secretary John Kelly - though a person with whom I respectfully differ on many issues - is a true public servant who I applaud for standing up and reminding everyone that we don't vow to the President-in-Office but to our constitution and the democratic principles enshrined in the American way of life."
• "Congress must - and certainly will - act upon the recommendations of the Select Committee because the office of the presidency will be respected. Democrats will work towards making the OPA an active subject in the whole pardoning process and avoid arbitrary individuals like President Van Horn abusing such authority."
• "The Select Committee's report concludes that Congress will also have to do extensive damage control within our intelligence community and our allies. Diplomatic efforts and comprehensive reform will have to be achieved fast as we cannot let President Van Horn's administration keep undermining credibility, leaving vulnerabilities that adversaries may exploit."
• "To the world and the American people, I say: How are we to trust Kyle Van Horn, if his cabinet and our allies worldwide don't seem to trust him?"

[Mikey]

Name and State: Wyatt Granger, Montana

Reason: Covenant of the New Dawn/Montana Ethics Report

Target: Local, National Right Wing

• "The Ethics and Accountability Commission’s findings reveal a shocking betrayal of public trust by the Department of Justice. Fabricating evidence and misusing power is unacceptable, and I’m calling on those responsible to resign immediately. Montanans deserve better from the institutions meant to protect them."
• "The Covenant of the New Dawn is a serious threat to our communities. They operate under the guise of faith and freedom but thrive on division and fear. As someone who spent two decades fighting extremism overseas, I won’t let it take root here in Montana."
• "I will always stand for Montanans’ constitutional rights, but those rights come with responsibilities. We must reject organizations that exploit them to harm our communities. That’s why I’m calling for federal action against the Covenant and reforms within the DOJ to rebuild trust and ensure justice."

[Dogslife]

Name and State: Sam Crafts (D-WA)
Reason: Select Committee Report on Edward Snowden's Pardon
Target: National Left Wing, Center

- "The issue is not over if the pardon was right or wrong or if he had the power to do it. The issue is if the circus ringleader Van Horn used his power appropriately and in the interests of national security. The bipartisan report simply says he did not."

- "If you chose to pardon someone living in exile in a country that is not friendly to the US, who has intelligence documents on US interests, you should at least ask SOMEONE else in your administration to look over it. He did not ask the pardon attorney. He did not ask his own homeland security secretary. He did not consult the US intelligence community. Our allies told him they had concerns about trust in intelligence sharing because of the pardon. He did not care if this jeopardized national security because he just wanted to score political points. Its like a farmer not consulting the chickens before letting the fox in the coop." 

- "If Van Horn's own cabinet cannot trust him to be honest with them about his decision making and agenda, why should the American then believe a word he says?"

[Alaskansockeyepuffs]

Name and State: Hannah Trujillo Kahiona (D-HI)

Reason: Van Horn's Pardon, and Trust (or lack there of) in him

Target: National Left Wing and Right Wing 

• The unilateral decision by President VanHorn to pardon Edward Snowden, without consulting his cabinet, Congress, or national security experts, is not only dangerous but shortsighted. This decision undermines trust in the presidency and raises serious questions about his judgment and priorities.
• Edward Snowden's actions revealed critical government secrets and compromised the security of our nation. A decision of this magnitude, bypassing key advisors and stakeholders, signals a disregard for the advice of those tasked with protecting our country. The pardon sends a chilling message to our intelligence community and allies: the President is willing to make decisions with grave security implications without input from the experts who understand the stakes.
• Secretary Kelly's resignation in the wake of this decision highlights the deep divisions and lack of trust within the President's own administration. When his closest advisors feel compelled to step down, it signals a profound crisis in leadership. The resignation of a high-ranking official is not just a disagreement; it’s a statement that the President's decision-making process is fundamentally broken.
• "It is imperative that Congress investigates this decision. Why was it made? Who, if anyone, was consulted? And what were the President's true motives? As representatives of the American people, we in Congress have a responsibility to hold the President accountable and ensure that decisions impacting national security are made with transparency and due process."
• "This moment is bigger than Edward Snowden or even President Van Horn. It’s about preserving the integrity of our institutions, upholding the rule of law, and ensuring that the American people can trust their leaders to act with wisdom and accountability."

[Alaskansockeyepuffs]

Name and State: Hannah Trujillo Kahiona (D-HI)

Reason: Van Horn's Pardon Snowden Pardon Fiasco

Target: National Left Wing and Right Wing 

• "The American people deserve to know why President Van Horn made the unprecedented decision to pardon Edward Snowden without consulting his national security team, his cabinet, or even our closest allies. A Congressional report is crucial to uncovering the rationale—or lack thereof—behind this reckless act.Congress must investigate not only the decision itself but also the President’s decision-making process. Was this driven by a genuine belief, outside influence, or something more troubling? We cannot allow these questions to go unanswered."
• Making such a consequential decision behind the backs of his own national security advisors is foolhardy, stupid, and utterly insane. It shows a complete disregard for the expertise and systems in place to guide such critical matters. By circumventing his advisors and allies, President VanHorn has not only endangered our national security but also our relationships with key international partners. This kind of impulsive, unilateral action erodes trust on every level."
• When members of the President's own cabinet, like Secretary Kelly, resign in protest, it’s a clear sign of dysfunction at the highest levels of government. If they cannot trust him to involve them in decisions of this magnitude, why should the American people trust him?If President VanHorn refuses to be honest with his own team about his decision-making process and agenda, how can Americans believe a word he says? Leadership requires trust, and this President has shattered it."
• "Congress has a duty to hold the President accountable for his actions, especially when they defy logic and endanger the American people. This committee's report is not about politics—it’s about protecting our democracy and national security. Without transparency, we cannot address the deeper issues at play in this administration. The American people deserve answers, not secrecy and chaos."
• "This pardon is a symptom of a larger crisis in leadership under President VanHorn. His decision-making is erratic, his judgment is flawed, and his priorities are misguided. A Congressional investigation is not just needed—it is essential to safeguard the principles of accountability and responsible governance. We cannot afford a President who acts alone, without thought or consultation, on matters that affect the safety and trust of an entire nation. It’s time for Congress to step up and do what this President will not: provide clarity and accountability to the American people."

[DMH]

Name: Earl Duplantis (R-LA)
Reason: Bogus Select Committee and Democratic Hysteria
Target: Right Wing, Center

• "The Russia! Russia! Russia! hysteria that has gripped the Democratic Party since Donald Trump went down the escalator in 2015 has yielded a nothingburger as expected. Democrats, in their blatant desire to attack the President, are now shifting the goalposts from vast conspiracies of Russian involvement to arguing over procedure with bureaucrats. A severely unserious party dedicated to impugning the integrity of a good man at whatever the cost."
• "It was okay with Democrats when Joe Biden gave his own son, who has direct business ties with China and Russia, a blanket pardon for crimes committed over the last decade. Where was the call for a 19 person commission then to investigate this clear act of nepotism? If Democrats actually move forward with a bogus censure of the President, I hope they're ready to censure Joe Biden, Barack Obama, and Bill Clinton while they're at it! It's lunacy!"
• "If you wanted my genuine opinion, I think Democrats had the censure of the President written up before the House even created a Select Committee. We all see how they talk about the President to the press, ever more personal as they attempt to create a boogeyman out of a reality where it simply does not exist. This Congress has been one of the more productive in recent memory on critical issues facing Americans because of a supportive President."
• "Democrats have nothing left to offer the American People than artificial fights built on the back of hypocrisy. Republicans remain focused on the critical issues facing the American People and I think the record speaks for itself. The Van Horn Derangement Syndrome honestly rivals TDS somedays with these folks. This sham has been exposed and we will move forward, addressing the real issues."

[DMH]

Name: Earl Duplantis (R-LA)
Reason: Select Committee Nonsense and Contrast of Priorities
Target: Left Wing, Center

• "On one hand, you have the Senate on the cusp of passing the most significant bipartisan energy reform of a generation. I am appreciative of my Republican colleagues and commonsense Democrats who recognize this moment as critical to unleashing America’s energy independence. The Defending American Energy Independence Act is a major bipartisan victory, one of many that the White House and Congress have racked up, contrary to the naysayers."
• "In contrast, you have my Democratic colleagues demanding a censure of the President over his legal right to issue a pardon, a right reaffirmed by their wasteful commission. How many people does it take to vindicate that a President has the right to pardon, apparently… 19. An entire select commission created just to reaffirm the President’s constitutional right to pardon. Americans need a Congress serious about the issues they face."
• "The Democratic Party vision of doom and gloom is only as real as when they dream of it. This Congress and White House have delivered bipartisan reform on wages, on taxes, on healthcare, and now on energy. Republicans choose to address the real issues facing everyday Americans. In a world more stable than it was two years ago under the last administration to a consistent track record of policy success done with support from both parties, the President and this Congress continue to move forward."
• "The choice is clear: bogus investigations and petty censures or concrete policy achievements that make tangible impacts on the lives of working people? We've shown our ability time and again to work with our Democratic counterparts, despite the hyper-partisan often on display, to make a tangible impact on the lives of working people. We intend to continue to do that and I can only hope the House returns to addressing real matters."
   

[Dogslife]

Name and State: Sam Crafts (D-WA)
Reason: Van Horn Circus is becoming the Van Horn Crisis
Target: National Left Wing, Center

- "The stats confirm what our working families have been feeling all along. The Van Horn Circus is ruining our economy."

- "Consumers costs are rising with out of control inflation. Nobody can afford a home. Unemployment is the highest since COVID. Republicans have shown time and time again that they do not care a bit about American workers."

- "If he actually cared about the working class then the ringleader Van Horn should stop sitting on his hands and do something about the economy. As much as I hope it doesn't happen,, right now the Van Horn Circus is becoming the Van Horn Crisis."

[Dogslife]

Name and State: Sam Crafts (D-WA)
Reason: Latest polls show Americans are done with the Republican circus
Target: National Left Wing, Center

- "If you look at the latest round of polling its clear the American people want change. They are consistently choosing to buck the establishment that has run the working class into the ground"

- "Progressive policies like lowering the cost of college, lowering housing costs, and protecting our environment are resonating with voters from New York to Arizona."

- "Its only natural that voters will not fill the bubble next to candidates that are raising inflation, poverty, gas prices, and housing costs. Its the economy stupid. Democrats are the only ones with plans to actually solve any of these problems. Republicans are just sitting on their hands giving handouts to big businesses."

[Dogslife]

Name and State: Sam Crafts (D-WA)
Reason: Sam Crafts introduces generational investment in green housing.
Target: National Left Wing, Center

- "At a time when housing costs are astronomical, Americans deserve a solution. That is why I introduced a major investment in expanding the public housing supply and ensuring these projects are energy efficient and environmentally friendly."

- "The GREEN Housing Act will create 280,000 new high paying jobs and require green public housing projects buy American. This is the spark we need to turn around the sluggish economy under the Van Horn Circus, reduce housing costs, and get ahead of China on green energy."

- "I am a climate scientist and I am a pragmatic progressive. I know we can walk and chew gum at the same time just like we can build new housing and protect the environment at the same time. This isn't some crazy liberal pipe dream. This is common sense grants to let American workers build green American homes with American materials."

[Blake]

Name and State: Charlotte O'Hare (D-HI)

Reason: Pell Grant Preservation and Expansion Act

Target: Center and Left Wing

• Today the Senate has passed the Pell Grant Expansion Act. I am very glad that even in this day and age of hyper partisanship we can come together and tackle the college affordability crisis. This bill will go a long way in making sure that every child in America who wants to go to college can afford to go to college. Over the next few years, it will nearly double the Pell Grant to $14k per year and then link the Pell Grant with the consumer price index making sure that the grant will keep pace with inflation so that students are not being left behind because of gridlock in Washington. 
• This bill also undoes the cuts to the Pell Grant eligibility that were done at the height of the Great Recession. American students should be allowed to keep their Pell Grants even if it takes them a few semesters to discover what they want to do. We are asking people who are barely adults to determine their life path for the future. There should not be a loaded gun to their heads forcing them to get it right the first time, otherwise they will not be able to complete their education. In addition, the raised eligibility years makes it easier for students to pursue part time pathways through school to make it easier for students to work to pay for their education instead of having to resort to receiving loans. 
• We all make mistakes and your ability to afford an education should not be denied because an eighteen-year-old struggled the first time around. People who prove that they are capable and willing to finish the job should get the helping hand they need. That is why I made sure that the bill included a provision that would allow people to be eligible again after two years leaving school or by working hard to catch up while remaining in school. 
• I am especially proud that this bill opens up the Pell Grant to Dreamers. They were brought here as children. Not by their own choice but because their parents or guardians wished for them to have a better life. As far as they are concerned, they are Americans. They've grown up here. They have paid taxes here. And a lot of them are working hard. Now at this point why shouldn't we make sure that they have the opportunities that any other American should have? 
• This is not the final solution. We must continue to work on making college affordable for all Americans. I hope that this step goes a long way in easing the burdens for poor Americans who want to get a great education. I want to see public colleges free for All Americans. However, for now while there is not a Democratic controlled congress, I will be pushing for small solutions both to affordability and to the student loan crisis. We must allow Americans to discharge student loans in bankruptcy. We must reform public student loans to have a fair fixed interest rate so that no American is punished simply by the year the happened to be born.