Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

119th CONGRESS
2nd Session
S. XXX

To require the Secretary of Energy to establish a hydrogen infrastructure finance and innovation pilot program, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
Mr. Storm, and Ms. s. Trujillo Kahiona (for themselves and others with thanks to Mr. Fitzpatrick ) introduced the following bill; 

A BILL

To require the Secretary of Energy to establish a hydrogen infrastructure finance and innovation pilot program, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the “Hydrogen Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act”.

SEC. 2. STUDY.

Not later than 18 months after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Energy, in coordination with the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, the Chair of the Council on Environmental Quality, the Administrator of the Energy Information Administration, and the heads of other relevant Federal agencies, shall conduct a study subject to notice and public comment—

(1) to fully assess and report the potential layout of pipeline corridors, including existing and new infrastructure, that—

(A) are robust against a range of projected hydrogen demand futures; and

(B) reflect the potential to site within, or adjacent to, existing pipeline or other linear infrastructure corridors;

(2) to assess the costs associated with each infrastructure scenario described in paragraph (1);

(3) to synthesize the results from research, development, and demonstration projects on materials and metallurgy for transporting and storing hydrogen and hydrogen-based fuels, such as ammonia;

(4) to determine outstanding questions with regard to research, development, and demonstration of infrastructure for transporting and storing hydrogen and hydrogen-based fuels, such as ammonia;

(5) to investigate the behavior and environmental impact of hydrogen leakage in pipelines and from geologic storage sites and nongeologic storage equipment;

(6) to determine best practices for the construction and maintenance of hydrogen pipelines;

(7) to determine the reduction in carbon intensity at various levels of hydrogen blending into the natural gas network; and

(8) to establish a framework for the measurement, reporting, and management of hydrogen leaks.

SEC. 3. SUPPORTING HYDROGEN INFRASTRUCTURE AND REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT OF HYDROGEN.

(a) Definitions.—In this section:

(1) BOARD-REGULATED RATES.—The term “Board-regulated rates” means rates regulated by the Surface Transportation Board.

(2) COMMISSION-REGULATED RATES.—The term “Commission-regulated rates” means rates regulated by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.

(3) COMMON CARRIER.—The term “common carrier” means a transportation infrastructure operator or owner that—

(A) publishes a publicly available tariff containing the just and reasonable rates, terms, and conditions of nondiscriminatory service; and

(B) holds itself out to provide transportation services to the public for a fee.

(4) ELIGIBLE ACTIVITY.—The term “eligible activity” means an activity described in subsection (g)(2) relating to, or carried out in connection with, an eligible project.

(5) ELIGIBLE ENTITY.—The term “eligible entity” means a corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust, non-Federal governmental entity, agency, or instrumentality, or other entity.

(6) ELIGIBLE PROJECT.—

(A) IN GENERAL.—Subject to subparagraph (B), the term “eligible project” means an infrastructure project for hydrogen transportation, storage, or delivery, including pipeline, shipping, rail, refueling, or other infrastructure, or associated equipment, as the Secretary determines to be appropriate.

(B) INCLUSION OF PIPELINE PROJECTS.—The term “eligible project” includes a pipeline project only if the project is for—

(i) the construction of 1 or more new pipelines that are capable of handling pure hydrogen; or

(ii) the retrofitting of 1 or more existing natural gas pipelines—

(I) to transport a blend of hydrogen and natural gas; and

(II) in a manner that will significantly increase the capacity of the pipelines to transport hydrogen, as determined by the Secretary.

(7) ELIGIBLE PROJECT COST.—

(A) IN GENERAL.—The term “eligible project costs” means—

(i) the costs of carrying out an eligible activity; and

(ii) any costs described in subparagraph (B) relating to, or incurred in connection with, an eligible project.

(B) COSTS DESCRIBED.—The costs referred to in subparagraph (A)(ii) are—

(i) the costs of capitalized interest necessary to meet market requirements, the costs of reasonably required reserve funds, capital issuance expenses, and any other carrying costs during construction of the applicable infrastructure; and

(ii) transaction costs associated with financing an eligible project, including the cost of legal counsel and technical consultants.

(8) HIFIA PILOT PROGRAM.—The term “HIFIA pilot program” means the hydrogen infrastructure finance and innovation pilot program established under subsection (b)(1).

(9) LETTER OF INTEREST.—The term “letter of interest” means a letter submitted by a potential applicant prior to an application for a grant or a loan under the HIFIA pilot program that—

(A) is in a format prescribed by the Secretary on the website of the HIFIA pilot program;

(B) describes the project and the location, purpose, and cost of the project;

(C) outlines the proposed financial plan, including—

(i) the requested grant or loan assistance; and

(ii) the proposed obligor, if applicable;

(D) provides a status of environmental review; and

(E) provides information regarding satisfaction of other eligibility requirements of the HIFIA pilot program.

(10) LOW-INCOME OR DISADVANTAGED COMMUNITY.—The term “low-income or disadvantaged community” means a community (including a city, a town, a county, and any reasonably isolated and divisible segment of a larger municipality) with an annual median household income that is less than 100 percent of the statewide annual median household income for the State in which the community is located, according to the most recent decennial census.

(11) OBLIGOR.—The term “obligor” means an eligible entity that is liable for payment of the principal of, or interest on, a loan under the HIFIA pilot program.

(12) SECRETARY.—The term “Secretary” means the Secretary of Energy.

(b) Establishment.—

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary, in consultation with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, the Surface Transportation Board, and the Administrator of the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, shall establish a hydrogen infrastructure finance and innovation pilot program under which the Secretary shall provide—

(A) financial assistance to eligible entities for eligible projects through—

(i) grants; or

(ii) long-term, low-cost supplemental loans; and

(B) technical assistance in accordance with subsection (l).

(2) COORDINATION WITH HYDROGEN HUBS.—

(A) IN GENERAL.—To ensure that the HIFIA pilot program is compatible with, and complementary to, any hydrogen hubs developed under any other law, the Secretary, to the maximum extent practicable and subject to subparagraph (B), shall coordinate the establishment of the HIFIA pilot program with—

(i) any program to support the development of hydrogen hubs that is required to be established under any other law; and

(ii) the development of those hydrogen hubs.

(B) TREATMENT.—Coordination with a hydrogen hub under subparagraph (A) shall not—

(i) be considered to be a priority criterion in determining whether to provide assistance for an eligible project under the HIFIA pilot program; or

(ii) preclude the provision of assistance under the HIFIA pilot program for another eligible project that—

(I) meets the criteria described in subsections (d) and (e); and

(II) is an objectively superior project, as determined by the Secretary.

(c) Eligibility.—

(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary may provide financial assistance for an eligible project under the HIFIA pilot program if—

(A) the eligible entity proposing to carry out the project submits a letter of interest prior to submission of an application under paragraph (2) with respect to the project; and

(B) the eligible entity and the eligible project meet all applicable requirements of this section.

(2) APPLICATIONS.—

(A) IN GENERAL.—To be eligible for a grant or a loan under the HIFIA pilot program, an eligible entity shall submit to the Secretary an application at such time, in such manner, and containing such information as the Secretary determines to be appropriate.

(B) ELECTION.—

(i) IN GENERAL.—An eligible entity may elect to apply for a grant, a loan, or both under the HIFIA pilot program.

(ii) DECISION.—The Secretary shall have discretion to award any mix of grants and loans under the HIFIA pilot program as the Secretary determines to be appropriate, including with respect to each eligible entity that applies for both a grant and a loan.

(C) APPLICATION PROCESSING PROCEDURES.—

(i) NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION.—Not later than 30 days after the date of receipt of an application under this paragraph, the Secretary shall provide to the applicant a written notice describing whether—

(I) the application is complete; or

(II) additional information or materials are needed to complete the application.

(ii) APPROVAL OR DENIAL OF APPLICATION.—Not later than 90 days after the date of issuance of a written notice under clause (i), the Secretary shall provide to the applicant a written notice informing the applicant whether the Secretary has approved or disapproved the application.

(d) Priority.—In selecting eligible projects to receive a grant or a loan under the HIFIA pilot program, the Secretary shall give priority to eligible projects that—

(1) will provide greater net impact in avoiding or reducing emissions of greenhouse gases; and

(2) are sited in a manner that minimizes environmental disturbance and other siting concerns, including by being sited within, or adjacent to, existing pipeline or other linear infrastructure corridors.

(e) Considerations.—In selecting eligible projects to receive a grant or a loan under the HIFIA pilot program, the Secretary, to the maximum extent practicable, shall select projects that—

(1) are large-capacity, common carrier infrastructure;

(2) enable geographical diversity in associated projects and supply chains to produce, use, or store hydrogen, with the goal of enabling projects in all major regions of the United States with current hydrogen demand and potential future hydrogen demand;

(3) aid in creating economies of scale for hydrogen uptake in applications requiring an affordable solution to reduce greenhouse gas emissions;

(4) will generate the greatest benefit to low-income or disadvantaged communities; and

(5) will—

(A) maximize creation or retention of jobs in the United States; and

(B) provide the highest job quality.

(f) Loans.—

(1) IN GENERAL.—In carrying out the HIFIA pilot program, the Secretary shall make loans to eligible entities, the proceeds of which shall be used to finance eligible projects.

(2) INTEREST RATE.—The interest rate of a loan under the HIFIA pilot program shall be not less than the interest rate on United States Treasury securities of a similar maturity to the maturity of the loan on the date of closing on the loan.

(3) MATURITY DATE.—The final maturity date of a loan provided under the HIFIA pilot program shall be the date that is 30 years after the date of substantial completion of the applicable eligible project.

(4) REPAYMENT.—

(A) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall establish a repayment schedule for each loan provided under the HIFIA pilot program.

(B) COMMENCEMENT.—Repayment of a loan provided under the HIFIA pilot program shall commence on the date of substantial completion of the applicable eligible project for which the loan was provided.

(C) DEFERRAL OF REPAYMENT.—If, at any time during the 5-year period beginning on the date of substantial completion of an eligible project, the project is unable to generate sufficient revenues in excess of reasonable and necessary operating expenses to pay the scheduled loan repayments of principal and interest on the loan, the Secretary may allow the borrower to defer repayment of the loan until the end of that 5-year period.

(5) REQUIREMENTS.—

(A) CREDITWORTHINESS.—

(i) IN GENERAL.—Each obligor with respect to a loan provided for an eligible project under the HIFIA pilot program shall be creditworthy, such that there exists a reasonable prospect of repayment of the principal and interest on the loan, as determined by the Secretary under clause (ii).

(ii) REASONABLE PROSPECT OF REPAYMENT.—The Secretary shall base a determination of whether there is a reasonable prospect of repayment under clause (i) on a comprehensive evaluation of whether the obligor has a reasonable prospect of repaying the loan for the eligible project, including evaluation of—

(I) the forecast of noncontractual cash flows supported by market projections from reputable sources, as determined by the Secretary, and cash sweeps or other structural enhancements;

(II) the strength of the contractual terms of an eligible project (if available for the applicable market segment);

(III) the projected financial strength of the obligor—

(aa) at the time of loan close; and

(bb) throughout the loan term, including after the project is completed;

(IV) the financial strength of the investors and strategic partners of the obligor, if applicable; and

(V) other financial metrics and analyses that are relied on by the private lending community and nationally recognized credit rating agencies, as determined to be appropriate by the Secretary.

(B) DEDICATED SOURCE OF REVENUE.—An eligible project for which a loan is provided under the HIFIA pilot program shall have a dedicated source of revenue separate from any financial assistance received under the HIFIA pilot program.

(g) Use Of Financial Assistance.—

(1) IN GENERAL.—A grant or loan provided under the HIFIA pilot program may be used for any eligible project costs.

(2) ELIGIBLE ACTIVITIES.—A grant or loan provided under the HIFIA pilot program may be used to carry out any of the following activities with respect to an eligible project:

(A) Development phase activities, including—

(i) planning;

(ii) preliminary engineering;

(iii) design;

(iv) environmental review;

(v) revenue forecasting; and

(vi) other preconstruction activities.

(B) Construction, reconstruction, rehabilitation, and replacement activities, including the training of construction personnel in handling and safety.

(C) Acquisition of—

(i) real property or an interest in real property; or

(ii) equipment.

(D) Environmental mitigation activities.

(E) Activities relating to construction contingencies.

(h) Federal Requirements.—

(1) IN GENERAL.—Nothing in this section supersedes the applicability of any other requirement under Federal law (including regulations).

(2) NEPA.—Federal assistance may only be provided under the HIFIA pilot program for a project that has received an environmental categorical exclusion, a finding of no significant impact, or a record of decision under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.).

(i) Leak Detection.—Each eligible entity that receives a loan or grant under the HIFIA pilot program shall conduct—

(1) a hydrogen leakage monitoring, reporting, and verification (also known as “MRV”) program; and

(2) a hydrogen leak detection and repair (also known as “LDAR”) program.

(j) Maximum Federal Involvement.—The maximum Federal share of an eligible project for which a loan is provided under the HIFIA pilot program shall not exceed 80 percent of the eligible costs of the project.

(k) Amendment.—Section 1703(b)(3) of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (42 U.S.C. 16513(b)(3)) is amended by striking “Hydrogen fuel” and inserting “Hydrogen technologies applicable to 1 or more end-use sectors, such as power generation, transportation, aviation, storage, industrial, and chemicals, including hydrogen fuel”.

(l) Technical Assistance.—

(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary and the National Laboratories may provide technical assistance under the HIFIA pilot program to assess the grading and readiness of existing infrastructure to transport, store, or deliver hydrogen with respect to informal State and regional planning for investments in that grading and readiness.

(2) PRIORITY.—In providing technical assistance under paragraph (1), the Secretary and the National Laboratories shall prioritize—

(A) preexisting infrastructure corridors;

(B) geologic storage potential for hydrogen; and

(C) industrial clusters.

(m) Regulatory Assessment To Encourage Hydrogen Transportation Infrastructure Deployment.—Not later than 270 days after the date of enactment of this Act, each of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, the Surface Transportation Board, and the Administrator of the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, in coordination with the Secretary, shall—

(1) assess jurisdiction over the siting, construction, safety, and regulation of hydrogen transportation infrastructure, including, at a minimum, the blending of hydrogen in natural gas pipelines;

(2) if that assessment indicates that additional authority is needed to support the deployment of hydrogen transportation infrastructure, submit to Congress a report describing the needed authority; and

(3) identify the eligibility of, and process for, hydrogen transportation infrastructure to receive cost recovery under the HIFIA pilot program through Commission-regulated rates, Board-regulated rates, or other applicable regulated rates, as appropriate, for the transportation of hydrogen in interstate commerce.

(n) Authorization Of Appropriations.—There is authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary to carry out the HIFIA pilot program $100,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2026 through 2029.

Edited by Storm
  • Replies 2
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic


  • Latest VGS News

    • A Sudden Burst of Sanity Strikes Congress By Rondal Goldfarb In another whiplash moment that defied expectations, Congress courageously stood up in unity to push back against some of the most egregious policy proposals of the 119th sessions to expand the welfare state.  In a shocking plot twist, the uniparty united against itself in a flurry of final votes in the final death throes of the 119th Congress. After a long session of rocketing through so many socialist bills through Congress at a speed that almost risked warping space time to deliver us into an alternative universe where their dystopian hellscape thrives, Speaker Jeffries and Minority Leader Hern (R-OK) curb stomped the brakes so hard that they actually flipped time back into a world where common sense survives and the free market still reigns, if only for a blissful but serene moment. After months of Democrats campaigning hard on their Soviet housing scheme, the HOUSE Act, and pitching the idea to every exhausted midwest farmer who took a blood oath to vote for them if they would just stop harassing them, Congresscritters united in lockstep to flush their own bill down the toilet and say JK by a vote of 433-0! Back to the drawing board. And thank goodness. The HOUSE Act, sponsored by Senators Storm, Guenther, and our old friend, Commie Kahiona, has a litany of problems with it but now that it has been relegated to the dustbin of history by the sponsors’ own Party, we’ll just cover the topline insanity: The HOUSE Act invests $175 Billion in taxpayer dollars into new public housing projects. Par for the course from The Three Apparatchiks. Public housing is a fundamentally flawed policy that exemplifies the inefficiencies of government intervention in the housing market. By centralizing control over housing production and management, public housing programs often suffer from poor quality construction, inadequate maintenance, and misallocation of resources. These projects frequently fail to meet the actual needs of low-income communities, fostering dependency rather than empowerment. Furthermore, public housing disrupts the natural dynamics of supply and demand, discouraging private investment and innovation in affordable housing solutions and raising costs for everyone else. A better approach would be to reduce regulatory barriers, such as construction mandates and Davis Bacon requirements, to encourage a competitive housing market that organically addresses the diverse needs of individuals while promoting economic mobility and self-reliance. While it is perfectly reasonable to question the Republican leadership’s judgment as well, given their sworn allegiance to the People’s First Agenda, the move somewhat tracks with the sudden reversal from trend in their decision to kill the veto overturn over the Blutarsky Bill. Interestingly though, the Republicans are the only ones that have justified their actions in the House on this issue. Democrats, meanwhile, have been as unified in their silence on the motion as they were in their opposition. Outgoing Senate Majority Leader Duplantis (R-Red Lobster) tried to get Senator Storm to answer for it on the Corporate News Media’s bungled election coverage but was met with the same deafening silence as when Vanessa Taylor herself also asked them questions they did not want to answer. Personally, we do not really need a reason; we just hope this turning over a new leaf for Congress carries over into the next session. But wait. There’s more! After politically posturing from adding modest benefit changes to Medicare all the way through Medicare for All and beyond, House Democrats and Republicans both finally mustered enough courage to unanimously renounce a bill by the DNC Chair herself, Senator O’Hare (D-HI), to provide coverage for dental, vision, and hearing services under Medicare. Nevermind that the program has less than 10 years left to live even before considering the additional costs of the proposed expanded benefits. For reasons that remain unknown to all, (even staffers could be seen literally aghast from camera #4 on C-SPAN 2,) House Democrats under Speaker Jeffries finally heard the call of their fallen comrade, President Biden, and beat Medicare. Or saved it, from our perspective. At least for now. We really are not in Kansas anymore. This phenomenon is basically unprecedented in House history. Why did the leadership of a party that campaigned so heavily on housing and health issues suddenly bring up their own bills in the final weeks of Congress only to self-immolate them on the floor like a teething toddler in a tantrum? The world may never know.  But for the rest of us watching at home, your entitlements will endure a little longer, and we are not all being rounded into taxpayer-sponsored Soviet style tenements against our will just yet. At least until January. Until then, you can check out any time you like, but only if you continue to: #ChooseFreedom
    • Treasury Secretary Levi Koenig Approves New Opportunity Zones in New Jersey, Calls for Nationwide Participation by Jean Luke Perry Secretary of the Treasury Levi Koenig has announced the approval of a request to designate New Jersey’s Urban Enterprise Zones as federal Opportunity Zones at the request of Senator Vini Vinachelli (R-NJ), marking a significant expansion of the program aimed at driving economic revitalization in distressed communities. The move comes as part of the Innovation Growth Amendment under the Permanent Tax Cuts Act, championed by Senators Levi Koenig (R-FL), Osiris Storm (D-NY), Charlotte O’Hare (D-HI), and led by the Van Horn administration. The initiative will bring a new round of 5,000 Opportunity Zones to economically struggling areas, including those within New Jersey’s UEZs. Secretary Koenig hailed the decision as a “strategic alignment of federal and state resources to unlock unprecedented investment and growth.” “New Jersey’s Urban Enterprise Zones have been a proven success in fostering economic development, and expanding the Opportunity Zone program to these areas will enhance their impact,” Koenig said in a press conference. “I encourage states across the country to submit their proposals for the next round of designations so we can continue driving transformative change in underserved communities.” New Jersey’s UEZs, which have historically faced high unemployment and limited access to capital, will now benefit from the tax incentives and investment opportunities provided by the OZ framework. This dual-front strategy leverages federal and state initiatives to attract private-sector investment, support infrastructure projects, and stimulate business development. The Treasury Department also confirmed that existing Opportunity Zones expiring in December 2026 would be eligible for re-designation under the new legislation, granting an additional five years of benefits to previously designated areas. This renewal option aims to ensure sustained growth in areas where OZs have shown measurable success. Governor Jack Ciattarelli of New Jersey added, “This designation positions our state as a leader in economic revitalization. We’re committed to ensuring these new Opportunity Zones create equitable and sustainable opportunities for residents and businesses.” The Treasury Department has invited all states to submit proposals for the expanded Opportunity Zone program, emphasizing the importance of targeting areas with significant economic challenges. Secretary Koenig assured that the application process would prioritize transparency and collaboration with local governments and community stakeholders. As the next round of Opportunity Zone designations begins, the federal government is optimistic that the expanded program will continue driving private investment into areas most in need, fulfilling its mission to foster economic opportunity and build stronger, more resilient communities.
  • Upcoming Events

    No upcoming events found
  • Recent Achievements

    • Marmot Of The Marsh earned a badge
      1 Month Anniversary
    • DannyUK earned a badge
      1 Week Anniversary
    • Artifex earned a badge
      First Steps

×
×
  • Create New...