Jump to content

H.R. 022 | Increasing Access to Mental Health in Schools Act


Recommended Posts

  • VGS Admin
Posted (edited)

The House shall come to order to debate this legislation for a period of 72 hours.

 

 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

Dr. Williams, for himself; with thanks to Mr. Tester introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

A BILL

To increase the recruitment and retention of school-based mental health services providers by low-income local educational agencies.

1. Short title

This Act may be cited as the Increasing Access to Mental Health in Schools Act.

2. Definitions

In this Act:

(1) Best practices: The term best practices means a technique or methodology that, through experience and research related to professional practice in a school-based mental health field, has proven to reliably lead to a desired result.

(2) Eligible graduate institution: The term eligible graduate institution means an institution of higher education that offers a program of study that leads to a masters or other graduate degree—

(A) in school psychology that is accredited or approved by the National Association of School Psychologists' Program Approval Board (or its successor) or the Commission on Accreditation of the American Psychological Association and that prepares students in such program for the State licensing or certification examination in school psychology;

(B) in school counseling that prepares students in such program for the State licensing or certification examination in school counseling;

(C) in school social work that is accredited by the Council on Social Work Education and that prepares students in such program for the State licensing or certification examination in school social work;

(D) in another school-based mental health field that prepares students in such program for the State licensing or certification examination in such field, if applicable; or

(E) in any combination of study described in subparagraphs (A) through (D).

(3) Eligible partnership

The term eligible partnership means—

(A) a partnership between 1 or more low-income local educational agencies and 1 or more eligible graduate institutions; or

(B) in any region in which local educational agencies may not have a sufficient elementary school and secondary school student population to support the placement of all participating graduate students, a partnership between a State educational agency, on behalf of 1 or more low-income local educational agencies, and 1 or more eligible graduate institutions.

(4) Institution of higher education

The term institution of higher education has the meaning given such term in section 102 of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1002), but excludes any institution of higher education described in section 102(a)(1)(C) of such Act.

(5) Local educational agency

The term local educational agency has the meaning given the term in section 8101 of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 7801).

(6) Low-income local educational agency

The term low-income local educational agency means a local educational agency—

(A) for which not less than 20 percent of the students served by such agency are from families with incomes below the poverty line as determined by the Bureau of the Census on the basis of the most recent satisfactory data available; and

(B) that, as of the date of application for a grant under this Act, has ratios of school counselors, school social workers, and school psychologists to students served by the agency that are not more than 1 school counselor per 275 students, not more than 1 school psychologist per 770 students, and not more than 1 school social worker per 250 students.

(7) Participating eligible graduate institution

The term participating eligible graduate institution means an eligible graduate institution that is part of an eligible partnership awarded a grant under section 3.

(8) Participating graduate

The term participating graduate means an individual who—

(A) has received a masters or other graduate degree in a school-based mental health field from a participating eligible graduate institution and has obtained a State license or credential in the school-based mental health field; and

(B) as a graduate student of a school-based mental health field, was placed in a school served by a participating low-income local educational agency to complete required field work, credit hours, internships, or related training as applicable.

(9) Participating low-income local educational agency

The term participating low-income local educational agency means a low-income local educational agency that is part of an eligible partnership awarded a grant under section 3.

(10) School-based mental health field

The term school-based mental health field means each of the following fields:

(A) School counseling.

(B) School social work.

(C) School psychology.

(D) Any other field of study that leads to employment as a school-based mental health services provider.

(11) School-based mental health services provider

The term school-based mental health services provider has the meaning given the term in section 4102 of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 7112).

(12) Secretary

The term Secretary means the Secretary of Education.

(13) State educational agency

The term State educational agency has the meaning given the term in section 8101 of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 7801).

(14) Student support personnel target ratios

The term student support personnel target ratios means the ratios of school-based mental health services providers to students recommended to enable such personnel to effectively address the needs of students, including—

(A) at least 1 school counselor for every 250 students (as recommended by the American School Counselor Association and American Counseling Association);

(B) at least 1 school psychologist for every 500–700 students (as recommended by the National Association of School Psychologists); and

(C) at least 1 school social worker for every 250 students (as recommended by the School Social Work Association of America).

(15) Unaccompanied youth

The term unaccompanied youth has the meaning given such term in section 725 of the McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 11434a).

3. Grant program to increase the number of school-based mental health services providers employed by low-income local educational agencies

(a) Grant Program authorized

From amounts made available to carry out this section, the Secretary shall award grants, on a competitive basis and after input from the peer review panel under subsection (d), to eligible partnerships, to enable the eligible partnerships to carry out pipeline programs to increase the number of school-based mental health services providers employed by low-income local educational agencies by carrying out any of the activities described by subsection (f).

(b) Grant Period

A grant awarded under this section shall be for a 5-year period and may be renewed for additional 5-year periods upon a showing of adequate progress, as determined by the Secretary.

(c) Application

To be eligible to receive a grant under this section, an eligible graduate institution, on behalf of an eligible partnership, shall submit to the Secretary a grant application. The application shall contain such information as the Secretary may require, including—

(1) an assessment of the existing (as of the date of application) ratios of school-based mental health services providers (in the aggregate and disaggregated by profession) to students enrolled in schools in each low-income local educational agency that is part of the eligible partnership; and

(2) a detailed description of—

(A) a plan to carry out a pipeline program to train, place, and retain school-based mental health services providers in low-income local educational agencies; and

(B) the proposed allocation and use of grant funds to carry out activities described in subsection (f).

(d) Peer review panel

(1) Establishment of panel

The Secretary shall establish a peer review panel to evaluate applications submitted under subsection (c) and make recommendations to the Secretary regarding such applications.

(2) Evaluation of Applications

In making its recommendations, the peer review panel shall take into account the purpose of this Act and the application requirements under subsection (c), including the quality of the proposed pipeline program described in subsection (c)(2)(A).

(3) Consideration of panel's recommendation

(A) In general

The Secretary may award grants under this section to eligible partnerships only after taking into consideration the recommendations of the peer review panel provided under this subsection.

(B) Explanation

In any case where the Secretary decides to not follow the recommendations of the peer review panel, the Secretary shall provide a written explanation of the decision to the panel and to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions of the Senate and the Committee on Education and Labor of the House of Representatives.

(4) Membership of panel

(A) In general

The peer review panel shall include at a minimum the following members:

(i) One clinical, tenured, or tenure track faculty member at an institution of higher education with a current appointment, as of the time of service on the panel, to teach courses in the subject area of school counselor education.

(ii) One clinical, tenured, or tenure track faculty member at an institution of higher education with a current appointment, as of the time of service on the panel, to teach courses in the subject area of school social worker education.

(iii) One clinical, tenured, or tenure track faculty member at an institution of higher education with a current appointment, as of the time of service on the panel, to teach courses in the subject area of school psychology education.

(iv) One clinical, tenured, or tenure track faculty member at an institution of higher education with a current appointment to teach courses in the subject area of teacher education.

(v) One individual with expertise in school counseling who works or has worked in public schools.

(vi) One individual with expertise in school social work who works or has worked in public schools.

(vii) One individual with expertise in school psychology who works or has worked in public schools.

(viii) One administrator who works or has worked for a low-income local educational agency.

(ix) One qualified and effective teacher who has substantial experience working for a low-income local educational agency.

(x) One community mental health provider.

(B) Clinical faculty member

At least 1 of the members described in subparagraph (A) shall be a clinical faculty member.

(e) Award basis

In awarding grants under this section, the Secretary shall—

(1) award the first 5 grants to eligible partnerships from 5 different States; and

(2) give priority to eligible partnerships that—

(A) propose to use the grant funds to carry out the activities described in paragraphs (1) through (3) of subsection (f) in schools that have higher numbers or percentages of low-income students and students not achieving a proficient level of academic achievement, as determined by the State, on the annual assessments required under section 1111(b) of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 6311(b))) in comparison to other schools that are served by the low-income local educational agency that is part of the eligible partnership;

(B) include 1 or more low-income local educational agencies that have fewer school-based mental health services providers, in the aggregate or for a particular school-based mental health field, per student than other eligible partnerships;

(C) include 1 or more eligible graduate institutions that offer the greatest number of graduate programs in the greatest number of different school-based mental health fields; and

(D) propose to collaborate with other institutions of higher education with similar programs, including sharing facilities, faculty members, and administrative costs.

(f) Use of grant funds

Grant funds awarded under this section may be used—

(1) to pay the administrative costs (including supplies, office and classroom space, supervision, mentoring, and transportation stipends as necessary and appropriate) related to—

(A) having graduate students of programs in school-based mental health fields placed in schools served by participating low-income local educational agencies to complete required field work, credit hours, internships, or related training as applicable for the degree, license, or credential program of each such student; and

(B) offering required graduate coursework for students of a graduate program in a school-based mental health services field on the site of a participating low-income local educational agency;

(2) for not more than the first 3 years after a participating graduate receives a masters or other graduate degree from a program in a school-based mental health field, or obtains a State license or credential in a school-based mental health field, to hire and pay all or part of the salary of the participating graduates working as a school-based mental health services provider in a school served by a participating low-income local educational agency;

(3) to increase the number of school-based mental health services providers per student in schools served by participating low-income local educational agencies, in order to work toward the student support personnel target ratios;

(4) to recruit, hire, and retain culturally or linguistically under-represented graduate students of programs in school-based mental health fields for placement in schools served by participating low-income educational agencies;

(5) to recruit, hire, and pay faculty as necessary to increase the capacity of a participating eligible graduate institution to train graduate students in school-based mental health fields;

(6) to develop coursework that will—

(A) encourage a commitment by graduate students in school-based mental health fields to work for low-income local educational agencies;

(B) give participating graduates the knowledge and skill sets necessary to meet the needs of—

(i) students and families served by low-income local educational agencies; and

(ii) teachers, administrators, and other staff who work for low-income local educational agencies;

(C) enable participating graduates to meet the unique needs of students at risk of negative educational outcomes, including students who—

(i) are English language learners;

(ii) have a parent or caregiver who is a migrant worker;

(iii) have a parent or caregiver who is a member of the armed forces, including the National Guard, who has been deployed or returned from deployment;

(iv) are homeless, including unaccompanied youth;

(v) have come into contact with the juvenile justice system or adult criminal justice system, including students currently or previously held in juvenile detention facilities or adult jails and students currently or previously held in juvenile correctional facilities or adult prisons;

(vi) have been identified as eligible for services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (20 U.S.C. 1400 et seq.) or the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 701 et seq.);

(vii) have been a victim to or witnessed domestic violence or violence in their community;

(viii) have been exposed to substance misuse at home or in the community; or

(ix) are foster care youth, youth aging out of foster care, or former foster youth; and

(D) utilize best practices determined by the American School Counselor Association, National Association of Social Workers, School Social Work Association of America, and National Association of School Psychologists and other relevant organizations;

(7) to provide tuition credits to graduate students participating in the pipeline program;

(8) for student loan forgiveness for participating graduates who are employed as school-based mental health services providers by participating low-income local educational agencies for a minimum of 5 consecutive years; and

(9) for similar activities to fulfill the purpose of this Act, as the Secretary determines appropriate.

(g) Supplement not supplant

Funds made available under this section shall be used to supplement, not supplant, other Federal, State, or local funds available for the activities described in subsection (f).

(h) Reporting requirements

(1) In general

Each eligible partnership that receives a grant under this section shall prepare and submit to the Secretary an annual report on the progress of the eligible partnership in carrying out the grant. Such report shall include a description of—

(A) actual service delivery provided through the grant funds, including—

(i) characteristics of the participating eligible graduate institution, including descriptive information on the educational model used and the actual academic program performance;

(ii) characteristics of graduate students participating in the pipeline program supported under the grant, including—

(I) performance on any examinations required by the State for credentialing or licensing;

(II) demographic characteristics; and

(III) graduate student retention rates;

(iii) characteristics of students of the participating low-income local educational agency, including performance on any tests required by the State educational agency, demographic characteristics, and promotion, persistence, and graduation rates, as appropriate;

(iv) an estimate of the annual implementation costs of the pipeline program; and

(v) the numbers of students, schools, and graduate students participating in the pipeline program;

(B) outcomes that are consistent with the purpose of the grant program under this Act, including—

(i) internship and post-graduation placement of the participating graduate students;

(ii) graduation and professional career readiness indicators; and

(iii) characteristics of the participating low-income local educational agency, including changes in the hiring and retention of qualified and effective teachers and school-based mental health services providers;

(C) the instruction, materials, and activities being funded under the grant; and

(D) the effectiveness of any training and ongoing professional development provided—

(i) to students and faculty in the appropriate departments or schools of the participating eligible graduate institution;

(ii) to the faculty, administration, and staff of the participating low-income local educational agency; and

(iii) to the broader community of providers of social, emotional, behavioral, and related support to students and to those individuals who train such providers.

(2) Publication

The Secretary shall publish the annual reports submitted under paragraph (1) on the website of the Department of Education.

(i) Evaluations

(1) Interim evaluations

The Secretary may conduct interim evaluations to determine whether each eligible partnership receiving a grant under this section is making adequate progress as the Secretary considers appropriate. The contents of the annual report submitted to the Secretary under subsection (h) may be used by the Secretary to determine whether an eligible partnership receiving a grant is demonstrating adequate progress.

(2) Final evaluation

The Secretary shall conduct a final evaluation to—

(A) determine the effectiveness of the grant program in carrying out the purpose of this Act; and

(B) compare the relative effectiveness of each of the various activities described in subsection (f) for which grant funds may be used.

(j) Report

Not earlier than 5 years nor later than 6 years after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to Congress a report containing—

(1) the findings of the evaluation conducted under subsection (i)(2); and

(2) such recommendations as the Secretary considers appropriate.

(k) Authorization of appropriations

(1) In general

There is authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary to carry out the program under this section, $200,000,000 for fiscal year 2025 and for each succeeding fiscal year.

(2) Reservation for evaluation

From the total amount appropriated to carry out this section each fiscal year, the Secretary shall reserve not more than 3 percent for evaluations under subsection (i).

4. Student loan forgiveness for individuals who are employed for 5 or more consecutive school years as school-based mental health services providers

(a) Establishment of program

The Secretary shall establish a program to provide student loan forgiveness for loans issued under parts B, D, and E of title IV of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1071 et seq., 1087a et seq., and 1087aa et seq.) to individuals who—

(1) are not, and have never been, participants in the grant program established under section 3; and

(2) have been employed for 5 or more consecutive school years as school-based mental health services providers by low-income local educational agencies.

(b) Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary such sums as may be necessary to carry out the program under this section.

5. Future designation study

(a) In general

The Secretary shall conduct a study to identify a formula for future designation of regions with a shortage of school-based mental health services providers to use in implementing grant programs and other programs such as the programs established under this Act or for other purposes related to any such designation.

(b) Basis of formula

The formula described in subsection (a) shall be based on the latest available data regarding an area served by a low-income local educational agency on—

(1) the number of residents under the age of 18 in such area;

(2) the percentage of the population of such area with incomes below the poverty line;

(3) the percentage of residents age 18 or older in such area who have earned secondary school diplomas;

(4) the percentage of students in such area who are identified as eligible for special education services;

(5) the youth crime rate in such area;

(6) the current number of full-time-equivalent and active school-based mental health services providers employed by the low-income local educational agency in such area, in the aggregate and disaggregated by profession;

(7) the number of students in such area in military families with parents in the armed forces (including the National Guard and Reserves) who have been alerted for deployment, are currently deployed, or have returned from a deployment in the previous school year; and

(8) such other criteria as the Secretary considers appropriate.

(c) Report

Not later than 2 years after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to Congress a report containing the findings of the study conducted under subsection (a).

Edited by Brink
  • Replies 6
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

New Dems - AYE

Rafael Coleman

US Senator from Colorado (2021-)

Senate Minority Leader (2025-) | Chair, New Democratic Coalition (2023-)

R17: Senator Camilo deSonido (I/D-CO) | R18: Vice President Camilo deSonido (D-CA)

Posted

Freedom Caucus: NAY

Senator Marjorie Ashcroft (R-NC)

Proudly Serving the Tarheel State Since 2015

Biography | Press Office | Legislative Record | Bank Account

Former Characters

Sen. Criselle Valda-Torres (D-VA), Sen. Winifred Zimmermann (D-IL), Sen. Edgar Villanueva (D-IL), Sen. Colton Buckley (R-WI), Sen. Rosalind Spencer (R-TN)

 

 

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Latest VGS News

    • The Sunset Statement 2026 Winners: The Progressives by Natalie Clarke With the 2026 midterms behind us, it is time to take a review at the major winners and losers of the elections as a whole. The Sunset Statement could not start anywhere else but with the Progressives who firmly sit in the winner's column. Firstly, in the Democratic primary they were the only ones who turned out in any semblance. With the benefit of hindsight all factions in Washington probably have a few regrets and things they would do differently. However, still looking at things holistically Progressives were capable of defending every single one of their Senate and Governors. They were able to pull off several upsets, with Nevada Cisco Aguilar pulling off a razor thin margin to win the nomination for Governor and Ritchie Torres did defeat sitting Governor Kathy Hochul in a landslide, while it did not turn out in Democrat's favor in those races in others it did work out. Sticking to Governors candidates backed by Progressives were elected in Michigan, Minnesota, Maine, and California by considerable margins. Michigan is the most interesting as its status as a swing state, but Governor McMorrow looks to have quite the bright future ahead of her. In addition, the only close primary for Governor Progressives were on the losing side was Georgia where Stacey Evans was narrowly defeated. In the Senate Democrats saw Elliot Pierce, Gretchen Whitmer,  Michelle Wu, and Tim Walz secure their nominations without a fight and every one of those would be elected to the Senate. Whereas of the competitive primaries for Senate Progressive backed candidates saw success in states that do not typically lean towards the Progressives including Idaho, Montana, Nebraska, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, and West Virginia. Which largely had more to do with lack of campaigning from other Democratic factions, but it still could represent a shift in the Democratic base towards further progressive politics even in more conservative states. In the less watched congressional races, there was a lot of victories, of all the races that started competitive Progressives were able to come out on top, they also got closer for comfort than I imagine people expected in races that were characterized as safe at the beginning. Notable victories include Katherine Tai in Maryland, Laura Conover in Arizona, and Sam Bell in Rhode Island. Sources close to the former Congressional Progressive Caucus Chair Pramila Jayapal when asked about how the CPC was feeling after the first round of campaigning said "The Progressive Caucus has demonstrated unprecedented momentum this cycle. We've expanded our ranks with candidates who champion critical values: access to safe and stable housing, as exemplified by Monica Montgomery Steppe; criminal justice reform, led by Sarita Simmons; and reproductive rights, championed by Laura Conover. Chair Jayapal believes this success is a testament to the grassroots energy behind our agenda and the growing demand for transformational change in Congress."   The Stars of the Show: There has been a real passing of the torch in Progressive politics. We have moved from the days of Bernie Sanders, where the Progressive leaders in the Senate were only malcontents on the outside looking in. Instead, we are at a point where Progressives are the major leaders, and more importantly largely the interparty bridge builders. It is interesting especially interparty wise Progressives are generally not the ones publicly being at the center of interparty issues. Of the bipartisan deals from the previous congress Progressives were at the center of them. Four Senators stand out at the top for their push policy wise, Senator O'Hare leading on Climate, gun control, and education. Senators Storm and Kahiona were leaders on the Democrats energy plan, and Senator Crafts has been involved on pushing Green Housing proposals. In addition, these four have worked closely with certain state governments to pass progressive legislation. No one embodies that push more than Senator O'Hare who rarely took a break from working with state democratic parties to push through progressive priorities, including universal school lunches, gun control, sanctuary states for abortion access, amongst others. Three of these Senators have also used their influence to push handpicked candidates in Democratic Primaries. Further details in their sections.  Senate Minority Leader Charlotte O'Hare of Hawaii Personal Story: Born on the big island of Hawaii to a middle-class family. She played softball in high school and later for both the University of Hawaii and the University of Washington, making the NCAA tournament twice during her collegiate career.  After graduating from the University of Washington to returned to her home of Hilo, Hawaii and became a teacher for third grade students at the Ernest Bowen de Silva Elementary School. She was the 2021 Hawaii teacher of the year for her work quickly adapting to the pandemic and helping other teachers out. She ran for the state legislature in 2022, and for the United State Senate in 2024. She has two daughters with her husband William, who is a pediatrician.  Political Story: The thirty-two-year-old Senator has made quite the name for herself since being elected to the Senate in 2024. It was a bold move by the party to select a youthful but inexperienced person to be in charge of the Democrats 2026 hopes. However, in that role she has proven the doubters wrong. Without a doubt this congress Senator O'Hare was the Democrats legislator-in-chief, most of the big policy pushes by Democrats have been with bills that she authored or co-authored. From gun control to student loans, education, Pell Grant, tax cuts, minimum wage you name it, Senator O'Hare at a minimum has a bill in the hopper at the very least. She also has the distinction of having two of the only bills without a Republican sponsor to pass the Senate with only one being vetoed by the President. Senator O'Hare is also not a noted partisan firebrand but is unafraid to take strong stands with several noted filibuster threats. Which is certainly going to keep fans of the more all or nothing Progressive types at least happy with the new Senate Minority Leader. She certainly retains a number of the traits of previous progressive leaders unwilling to keep quiet about issues she has with legislation, but if anyone has questions about her ability to get a deal done. They need not to look further than the fact that the minimum wage was increased and the expansion of the Child Tax Credit and Earned Income Tax Credit. Additionally, her work as DNC Chair, while early results in 2025 were mixed there were a lot of positives to come out of that experience, and the lessons learned could be just what the Democrats needed to push a successful 2026 campaign. While not without failures it is hard not to call it anything short of a mild victory. In the Primaries Senator O'Hare showed her value to the Progressive movement personally helping to deliver wins in the Rhode Island 1st, Maryland 5th, the Arizona 7th, and the South Dakota Senate race. It was her effort that nearly got Stacey Evans to win the Democratic nomination for Governor in the noted Progressive Stronghold of *checks notes* Georgia. In the General Election Senator O'Hare shows some value to the campaign helping out Senator Jon Ossoff successfully win reelection and was on the ground in Iowa helping Dr. Ellie Miller pull off a near upset. Senator O'Hare has at least shown that she has some campaign chops and fundraising ability has proven to be a major asset for Democrats. It is not hard to see why Senate Democrats have chosen to continue to place faith in the young Senator. Key Allies: Charlotte O'Hare is noted for her ability to work with all a broad range of ideologies within the Democratic caucus. She is noted for her circle being largely consistent of people who have formerly worked within education including Senator Rafael Coleman, Governors Anne Scarlett of Maine, Miranda Owens of California, Congresswoman Mālie Keahi, and Speaker of the House Willow Lui. She also is known to have a great relationship with noted Progressives Congresswoman Katherine Tai, Governor Josh Green, and Congresswoman Laura Conover. Outside of Progressive circles there are rumors that her and former Blue Dog Co-Chair Jared Golden had a great working relationship.  Notable not Friends: Senator O'Hare is not the only member of the Democratic caucus to have issues with Treasury Secretary Levi Koenig. For anyone at the 2024 Democratic National Convention it should come as no surprise the Senator is no fan of former President Bill Clinton. I imagine Democratic Leadership meetings are a bit awkward with the Senator being seen as actively avoiding the newly elected DNC Chairman Gus Guenther. The Oil Industry is also unlikely to be fond of the Senate Minority Leader given her vocal opposition to the Republican energy plan without changes to the drilling sections that better protected the environment and removed the tax breaks for oil companies.  2028 Endorsement: None Senate Minority Whip Hannah Trujillo Kahiona of Hawaii Personal Story: Our second native of Hawaii, Hannah was born on Kauai to an upper-class family. Her father was a local politician while her mother was a schoolteacher. Hannah a practicing Catholic has stated previously that religion plays an important role in her life. She is a graduate of Notre Dame before returning to Hawaii to work as a lawyer. Early in her career she went through a political journey started as a self-described republican prior to Donald Trump's entry into the 2016 Republican primary. As an attorney she worked for Governor David Ige and argued a case before the Hawaii state Supreme Court. Hannah and her husband Michael have two daughters.  Political Story: In 2015 she ran for the State Senator for the 25th district, where her campaign was focused on broad appeal despite being in a safe democratic district. By the time of the 2020 primary, Hannah had moved quite a bit more to her left supporting Bernie Sanders over Joe Biden. In 2022 she ran for senate to replace the retiring Brian Shatz. It did not take long for her to get settled into Washington with her seen as a contender in the Veepstakes after the surprise retirement of Kamala Harris. After Biden dropped from the top of the ticket, she was able to build the coalition needed to be nominated President. Ultimately despite winning the popular vote by nearly 3% she would lose the electoral college to President Allred and has remained in the Senate where she has moved over to being more of a Progressive voice. Her tenure in the 119th congress had notable wins but also a few missteps. A poor interview and hearing participation has taken her from the damn near guaranteed nominee if she wants it to just the frontrunner for the 2028 democratic nomination. She still stands strong with a very strong press presence and fundraising ability. No matter what the future holds Senator Kahiona is a major asset to the Democrats who helped turn a few races into nailbiters this cycle such as the Georgia Governor race and North Carolina Senate election as well as made sure that Michigan has a progressive governor in Mallory McMorrow.  Key Allies: It is one of the worst kept secrets in Washington that Hannah seems to be preparing another run for President and in that is including helping get allies into key states. She worked hard to have allies in rust belt states such as Governor Tiffany Kristiansen of Minnesota and Governor Mallory McMorrow of Michigan. One has to assume that she is still close to her choice of Vice President Governor of Kentucky Percy Eller. In addition, her endorsement of Jennifer Roumjong Lewis gave her the edge she needed to be elected to congress. Otherwise, her campaign in the primaries led her to having close relationships with Katherine Tai, and Kristen Gonzalez.  Notable not Friends: It is no secret that there is no love lost between Senator Kahiona and the 119th congress's Republican leadership. She was constantly clashing with Levi Koenig and later Earl Duplantis.  2028 Endorsement: None Senate Progressive Caucus Chair Osiris Storm of New York Personal Story: Born in the Bronx, Senator Storm comes from a working-class family. His mother was a nurse and his father a construction worker. He has said that he got into public service over the economic challenges he witnessed in his neighborhood as a child. A graduate of Columbia, Senator Storm started his career as a tenants' right lawyer. Helping renters in his community against evictions, rent control disputes, and protecting them against unscrupulous landlords. Senator Storm and his wife have three children.  Political Story: He started his political career in 2016 when he was elected to represent the New York 14th congressional district. His tenure in the house was short-lived as he ran for the Senate in 2018 successfully winning and becoming the junior senate for New York. During his tenure he has always been considered a leader on housing equality, economic equity, education, healthcare, and climate change. Osiris has always kept his roots close and has never forgotten where he came from. In 2024 he was selected to lead the Senate Progressive Caucus, and his tenure has seen progressives move from the fringe to the leaders. While his close connection with the Ritchie Torres campaign does dull a bit of the shine. One cannot overstate the impact that he has had on New York Democratic politics completely reshaping the party in his image. Time will tell in New York if this passed election was merely growing pains related to that. Outside of the top side races his influence within the congressional races shows that he is a valuable campaigner for the caucus and is a major asset to the party. He is also a very capable negotiator and his willingness to sit down and get a deal down is commendable.  Key Allies: Senator Elliot Pierce is a known close ally of Senator Storm. In addition, Senator Storm is closely associated with Mayor of NYC Brad Lander, and basically all elected democrats from New York City. Within the House wing outside of New York there are not a lot of immediate relationships, however he did campaign for Katherine Tai so there is likely a lot of good will there. Senator Storm's movement away from aggressive twitter feuds is likely going to see him bounce back in approval ratings which will probably make fair-weather friends come out of the woodwork.  Notable not Friends: One name comes to mind immediately. Kathy Hochul. While she might be finished in frontline politics. I imagine she might have been the only New York Democrat happy on election night. There's a very strong grudge here and it could manifest itself as a primary fight or a key endorsement of an opponent in Storm's next major campaign if that is a white house bid or reelection as Senator. Senator Storm and Rafael Coleman have seemed to bury the hatchet but there is likely still no love lost between the two men, especially as primary season quickly approaches.  2028 Endorsement: None Senator Samuel Crafts of Washington Personal Story: A quaker from Washington State, Samual Crafts comes from a working-class family from Olympia. He attended the University of Washington for a degree in political science and a master's in environmental and forest science. After graduating he worked as a volunteer firefighter and a member of the Washington National guard. After leaving the Washington national guard, he worked as a political staffer for a few years before running for public office. He and his wife have two children, Carter and Leanne.  Political Story: After working as a political staffer in Olympia he was elected to the Washington State house where he served four terms. In 2012 he was elected as the Representative for the Washington 6th congressional district. His four-term tenure he served on the Committee of Natural resources and the Transportation and Infrastructure committee. In addition, he was the ranking member on the Water, Wildlife, Fisheries Sub-committee. In 2020, he ran to be Washington's Public Lands Commissioner proving his ability to win a statewide primary and general. He was elected to the Senate in 2024. While it took him a bit of time to get settled, he has been a voice pushing for environmental protections and green housing. He has truly started to hit his stride and was an important figure in helping Democrats outreach into rural Washington.  Key Allies: He has limited to build a large circle in Washington, but it is known that he is well liked amongst Washington Progressives including congresswoman Ana Ruiz Kennedy, congresswoman Pramila Jayapal, and Governor of Washington Bob Fergusen. He also participated on the campaigns of congresswoman Lori Wilson, and Governor of Michigan Mallory McMorrow likely leaving a bit of good will there.  Notable not Friends: The good thing about keeping your head down for a while is that you're not likely to have many adversaries.  Other Progressive Leaders: With the Speaker of the House, nine other senators, twelve of Democrats twenty-three governors, and the largest caucus period in the house, there has been quite the change in the Democratic party. Progressives are ascendant at all facets of the party. Below is a list of Progressive Democrats whose endorsements should be considered important in the 2028 primary, and/or have a long promising career ahead of them in politics as progressive voices. Democrats' inclusion of super delegates only after the first ballot does limit the impact of endorsements by congressmen but still early momentum can have a major impact on the race.  2028 Endorsement: None Speaker of the House Willow Lui (California 28th) The newly elected Speaker of the House is widely regarded as one of the most pragmatic members of the Congressional Progressive caucus. A former teacher and child of Taiwanese immigrants. Willow has served five complete terms in the House and was the Chairwoman of the Education and Workforce committee during the 119th congress. She is considered a major ally of Senator O'Hare and the two of them are expected to be working closely together at least during this upcoming congress.  Democrats are putting a lot of faith in their youth this congress. Speaker Lui was noted for breaking with the Congressional Progressive caucus when they would threaten to not support Nancy Pelosi or Hakeem Jeffries for speaker. Her election shows that Progressives are moving up but bridges with the rest of the party are important. The Speaker like the Senate Minority Leader have a tough task to balance an aggressive and hungry progressive wing with much more measured members in the blue dogs and new democrats.  2028 Endorsement: None Senator Elliot Pierce of Illinois The new Senator for Illinois who was elected to replace the former Minority Whip Dick Durbin on a Progressive Platform focused on expanding collective bargaining rights, supporting small businesses, closing corporate tax loopholes, expanding affordable healthcare, investing in public schools, and fighting climate change. Senator Pierce is a former labor organizer. He helped negotiate a better contract for the United Steelworkers. He later worked as a labor attorney for the Illinois AFL-CIO. In 2010 he was elected President of the Illinois Federation of Labor. His efforts opposing right-to-work laws helped raise him to prominence and in 2014 he was elected to the Illinois State Senate, where he served for four years before being elected as the Representative for the Illinois 17th congressional district. He is associated strongly with Senator Osiris Storm and is seen as a key ally of the New York Senator.  2028 Endorsement: None Senator Lisa Blunt Rochester of Delaware 2028 Endorsement: None Senator Michelle Wu of Massachusetts  2028 Endorsement: None Senator Gretchen Whitmer of Michigan 2028 Endorsement: None Senator Tim Walz of Minnesota 2028 Endorsement: None Senator Cory Booker of New Jersey 2028 Endorsement: None Senator Jeff Merkley of Oregon  2028 Endorsement: None Senator Jack Reed of Rhode Island 2028 Endorsement: None Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont 2028 Endorsement: None Senator Peter Welch of Vermont  2028 Endorsement: None Senator Tammy Baldwin of Wisconsin 2028 Endorsement: None Governor of California Miranda Owens Progressives pulled of a coup with the election of Governor Miranda Owens, a former Principal of Lowell High School in San Fransico. Education is in her blood, with both of her parents being teachers, she has stated that she wanted to work as a principal to be a school administrator that her parents would have loved to have. Her work as principal helped raise her to local prominence which helped when she ran for congress in 2012. During her time in Congress, she was seen as a progressive voice opposing the Keystone XL Pipeline and the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act. In 2018, she was elected the California State Super Intendent of Public Instruction defeating Marshall Tuck, a charter school advocate. During her tenure she fought hard for expanded funding for education, Universal School Meals, and Universal Pre-K. Her time as Governor while a mild departure from Governor Newsom's time she is expected to continue her efforts to improve the California education system and address the housing issues in California. She is seen as a strong ally of Senator Charlotte O'Hare fitting the mold of the circle she keeps quite well.  2028 Endorsement: None Governor of Connecticut Sean Scanlon  2028 Endorsement: None Governor of Hawaii Josh Green 2028 Endorsement: None Governor of Maine Anne Scarlett Governor Scarlett comes from a middle-class Mainer family. Anne Scarlett is a former Pre-K teacher from Portland, Maine. The thirty-nine-year-old is the former Speaker of the Maine House of Representatives. Her election as Governor is a clear commitment to the path of public education. She is expected to fight for higher wages for teachers and smaller class sizes. it is likely that she will pursue expansions to public housing and push to increase the supply of new houses being built to help lower prices in Maine. She is also expected to work with other New England states in efforts to expand the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative in an effort to help protect the environment. With the unpopularity of Maine's for-profit energy utilities, she could pursue promoting Cooperative Energy companies commonly found in other states. She is a firm ally of Senator O'Hare giving O'Hare allies on both coasts.  2028 Endorsement: None Governor of Massachusetts Maura Healey 2028 Endorsement: None Governor of Michigan Mallory McMorrow 2028 Endorsement: None Governor of Minnesota Tiffany Kristiansen Governor Kristiansen has been a powerful progressive force in Minnesota politics. She was the leading voice in the efforts to pass an assault weapons ban in Minnesota that ultimately stalled out. Her election as Governor shows that the people of Minnesota are looking for stronger gun laws especially in the wake of continual inaction in Washington. She is also expected to pursue polices focused on combatting climate change, expanding union rights, and promoting affordable housing. Like many progressive Governors education is likely high on her list of priorities. Before her election as Governor, she passed Universal Pre-K for children in Minnesota. She is a former tank commander in the Minnesota national guard and later was a state trooper. From 2012 to 2020 she was the Governor of Duluth. Governor Kristiansen is a noted ally of the 2024 Democratic Nominee HTK.  2028 Endorsement: None Governor of New Mexico Tim Keller 2028 Endorsement: None Governor of Oregon Tina Kotek 2028 Endorsement: None Governor of Rhode Island Dan McKee 2028 Endorsement: None Governor of Washington Bob Ferguson 2028 Endorsement: None Governor of Wisconsin Tony Evers 2028 Endorsement: None
    • 🏈 College Football Playoff Selection Show 🏈 Conference Championship Game Results ACC Championship: (5) North Carolina 31 vs. (7) Cal 27 Big 12 Championship: (17) Baylor 40 vs. (6) Iowa State 9 Big Ten Championship: (3) USC 27 vs. (23) Michigan 24 SEC Championship: (2) LSU 10 vs. (1) Georgia 31 CUSA Championship: Liberty 10 vs. (10) Louisiana Tech 41 AAC Championship: (11) UTSA 34 vs. (25) Navy 40 MAC Championship: (24) Ball State 12 vs. Miami (OH) 35 MWC Championship: Wyoming 27 vs. Air Force 21 Sun Belt Championship: Troy 30 vs. South Alabama 16 Matchups: (12) Ohio State @ (5) Florida, winner faces (4) Baylor (9) Iowa State @ (8) Miami (FL), winner faces (1) Georgia (11) Cal @ (6) Notre Dame, winner faces (3) North Carolina (10) LSU @ (7) Louisiana Tech, winner faces (2) USC Semifinal Assignments: Georgia: Peach Bowl USC: Rose Bowl North Carolina: Sugar Bowl Baylor: Fiesta Bowl Tale of the Tape, Starting Quarterbacks: Georgia: RS SO Wilbert Slaton, T.C. Roberson HS (Asheville, NC). Started all games, 291/423, 3743 yds, 35 pass TDs, 10 interceptions. USC: SR Brian Brennan, El Rancho HS (Pico Rivera, CA). Started 12/13 games, 196/301, 2444 yds, 24 pass TDs, 8 interceptions. North Carolina: RS SO David Garay, Richland HS (Richlands, NC). Started all games, 263/408, 2652 yds, 24 pass TDs, 1 rushing TD, 4 interceptions. Baylor: RS JR Timothy Powers, Port Neches-Groves HS (Port Neches, TX). Started 12/13 games, 268/430, 3577 yds, 32 passing TDs, 13 interceptions. Florida: FR Joe Butler (probable), Spartanburg HS (Spartanburg, SC). Started 11/13 games, 173/280, 2060 yds, 19 passing TDs, 8 interceptions. SR Anthony Paulson, M.A. Traviss HS (Lakeland, FL). Started 1 game, played 5 games. 61/95, 652 yds, 6 passing TDs, 3 interceptions. Notre Dame: RS JR William Krueger, Case HS (Racine, WI). Started 12/13 games. 182/286, 2566 yds, 25 passing TDs, 5 interceptions. Louisiana Tech: RS JR Russ Luciano, Lakeside HS (Sibley, LA). Started 12/13 games. 216/308, 1789 yds, 19 passing TDs, 3 interceptions. Miami (FL): JR Jose Haskins, G.H. Braddock HS (Miami, FL). Started 12/13 games. 149/246, 2024 yds, 16 passing TDs, 1 rushing TD, 6 interceptions. Iowa State: Fifth year senior Peter Burnette, Shakopee HS (Shakopee, MN). Started 11/13 games, 145/261, 2495 yds, 18 passing TDs, 6 interceptions. LSU: SR James Gilliam, Avoyelles HS (Moreauville, LA). Started 11/13 games. 170/261, 2577 yds, 24 passing TDs, 8 interceptions. Cal: RS JR Theo McBride, Manteca HS (Manteca, CA). Started 12/13 games. 257/404, 3413 yds, 22 passing TDs, 1 rushing TD, 6 interceptions Ohio State: Fifth year Senior William McIntire, Beacon HS (Woonsocket, RI). Started 10/13 games, 183/286, 2501 yds, 21 passing TDs, 1 rushing TD, 9 interceptions. Tale of the Tape, Coaches: Georgia: Kirby Smart USC: Lincoln Riley North Carolina: Bill Belichick Baylor: Dave Aranda Florida: Billy Napier Notre Dame: Marcus Freeman Louisiana Tech: Sonny Cumbie Miami (FL): Mario Cristobal Iowa State: Matt Campbell LSU: Brian Kelly Cal: Justin Wilcox Ohio State: Ryan Day Tale of the Tape, NIL Rating (1-100): Ohio State: 93 (1) Baylor: 87 (8) Georgia: 86 (T-10) North Carolina: 86 (T-10) LSU: 83 (T-13) Notre Dame: 83 (T-13) USC: 83 (T-13) Iowa State: 79 (T-24) Miami (FL): 76 (T-32) Florida: 74 (T-38) Cal: 69 (T-51) Louisiana Tech: 60 (T-74) National Championship Sites Announced for 2028-2030: 2028: New Orleans, LA 2029: Arlington, TX (Cotton Bowl will move to quarter final) 2030: Miami Gardens, FL (Orange Bowl will move to quarter final) AD: Play the ESPN bracket game today here! Playoff Brackets.pdf
    • State of the World, Early 2027 posted at Vesica's request Although Americans have been focused on the 2026 elections in recent months, the world has continued to turn on its axis. Here are some of the latest developments from around the world in recent months: South America: Venezuela: OAS Peacekeepers continue to work with the administration of President Edmundo Gonzalez to rebuild and secure the nation. Loyalists to the regime of former President Nicolas Maduro, who was exiled to Russia, continue to wage a guerilla war in the east, while the Cercado Cartel is running rampant in the west. The Cercado Cartel used the unrest to expand their operations from Bolivia to attempt to build a stronghold in Venezuela. Central Venezuela is mostly quiet. Bolivia: The war between the Cercado Cartel and the Bolivian military continues to rage across the nation. Rumors continue to run rampant that the Cercado Cartel has bought off mass segments of the military to allow them to obtain victories in the war anywhere the Cartel isn't already strong. The Cercado Cartel has also reportedly widely ingrained itself in their areas of influence across the country by paying for schools, hospitals, churches, food, and protection. Europe: Right wing victories have been taking place in European nations outside of the United Kingdom. In the United Kingdom, Prime Minister Keir Starmer is reportedly struggling with a lagging economy and an extremely resurgent Reform UK which is now polling equally with the Labour party. Ukraine: Ukraine is gearing up for its first election since the Treaty of Ankara was signed. Pro-Russian parties are still banned from the nation but an opposition bloc has arisen through an alliance of regional parties that advocate for “protection of the Russian minority” rather than designating themselves as being "Pro-Russian". Asia: President Han Zheng’s Shanghai Clique maintains its dominance across China, while Taiwan and North Korea are currently quiet. Middle East: Analysts say that the Middle East is on the precipice of retaking the crown of being the mess of the world. The peace deal between Israel and the Palestinian Authority has been signed after Benjamin Netanyahu lost his post as prime minister and things are looking up there. However, there is mass instability in Syria with the collapse of Hezbollah and there are rumors of further dissent crackdown in Iran. 
  • Upcoming Events

    No upcoming events found
  • Recent Achievements


×
×
  • Create New...